AFSSA, French Agency for Food Safety, Pig, Poultry and Fishes Veterinary Research Laboratory, Epidemiology and Welfare of Poultry and Rabbits Research Unit, Zoopôle, BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France.
Prev Vet Med. 2010 May 1;94(3-4):240-50. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.01.011. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
A field study was conducted to estimate the sanitary condemnation proportion in male turkey broiler flocks, to describe the reasons for condemnation and the related macroscopic lesions, and to investigate whether primary production information would predict the risk of condemnation. Male turkey standard broiler flocks (117) were randomly selected in the 13 slaughterhouses located in Western France, from February to July 2006. The flocks were monitored from their arrival at the slaughterhouse until the results of the post mortem sanitary inspection. Information about rearing conditions, health history, catching and loading conditions, transportation to the slaughterhouse and slaughtering was also collected. Sampling design was considered in the calculations and the condemnation proportion was modelled using a negative binomial regression, accounting for clustering within slaughterhouse. The within-flock weighted average condemnation proportion was 1.8% (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.3%). Emaciation, arthritis-polyarthritis and congestion were the main reported official reasons for condemnation, representing 76% of the condemned carcases. Three variables were significantly associated with increased risk of condemnation: observed locomotor disorders on the farm, high cumulative mortality 2 weeks before slaughter, and clinical signs observed by the Veterinary Services during the ante mortem inspection at the slaughterhouse. The final model explained 35% of the total variation in condemnation risk. Half of this explained variation could be attributed to locomotor disorders observed during rearing. The sensitivity and specificity of the model to predict a high flock condemnation risk were 80% and 74%, respectively, when using an optimum threshold of 0.95% to define high risk. The results of this study suggested that the variables found to be associated with condemnation proportion were markers of increased risk and could be used as indicators. These risk indicators can easily be retrieved from the pre-existing regulatory document transmitted before flock arrival at the slaughterhouse and could be used to screen flocks before slaughter, according to their expected risk of condemnation.
本研究旨在估计雄性火鸡肉鸡群的卫生淘汰比例,描述淘汰原因及相关的宏观病变,并探讨初级生产信息是否可以预测淘汰风险。2006 年 2 月至 7 月,在法国西部的 13 个屠宰场中,随机选择了 117 个雄性火鸡标准肉鸡群进行了实地研究。从肉鸡到达屠宰场直到进行屠宰后卫生检查,对其进行监测。还收集了有关饲养条件、健康史、捕捉和装载条件、运输到屠宰场和屠宰的信息。在计算中考虑了采样设计,并使用负二项回归模型来模拟淘汰比例,同时考虑了屠宰场内的聚类情况。群体内加权平均淘汰比例为 1.8%(95%置信区间为 1.3-2.3%)。消瘦、关节炎-多发性关节炎和充血是主要的官方淘汰原因,占淘汰胴体的 76%。有三个变量与淘汰风险增加显著相关:农场观察到的运动障碍、屠宰前 2 周累积死亡率高、以及屠宰场屠宰前兽医服务观察到的临床症状。最终模型解释了淘汰风险总变异的 35%。其中一半的变异可以归因于饲养过程中观察到的运动障碍。当使用 0.95%作为定义高风险的最佳阈值时,该模型对高鸡群淘汰风险的预测的灵敏度和特异性分别为 80%和 74%。本研究结果表明,与淘汰比例相关的变量是风险增加的标志物,可以用作指标。这些风险指标可以很容易地从屠宰场到达之前传输的现有的监管文件中检索到,并且可以根据预期的淘汰风险在屠宰前对鸡群进行筛选。