Department of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of Education, University of London, London WC1H OAA, UK.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;30(3):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
The psychological literature on how fathers' behaviors may be related to children's psychopathology has grown substantially in the last three decades. This growth is the result of research asking the following three overarching questions: (1) what is the association between family structure, and particularly biological fathers' non-residence, and children's psychopathology, (2) what is the association between fathers' parenting and children's psychopathology, and (3) what is the association between fathers' psychopathology and children's psychopathology. The three broad theoretical perspectives relevant to this literature are the standard family environment model, the passive genetic model, and the child effects model. The evidence from studies comparing the first two models seems to suggest that the origin of the association between parental divorce and children's emotional and behavioral problems is largely shared environmental in origin, as is the association between resident fathers' parenting and children's emotional and behavioral problems, according to studies comparing the standard family environment model with the child effects model. However, research needs to compare appropriately all theoretical perspectives. The paper discusses this, and also points to the importance of considering theory-driven specificity in modeling effects.
在过去的三十年中，关于父亲的行为如何与儿童精神病理学相关的心理学文献有了很大的发展。这种增长是研究提出以下三个总体问题的结果：（1）家庭结构，特别是生物学父亲的不居住，与儿童精神病理学之间有什么关联，（2）父亲的育儿方式与儿童精神病理学之间有什么关联，以及（3）父亲的精神病理学与儿童精神病理学之间有什么关联。与该文献相关的三个广泛的理论观点是标准家庭环境模型、被动遗传模型和儿童效应模型。比较前两个模型的研究证据似乎表明，父母离婚与儿童情绪和行为问题之间的关联，以及与居住父亲的育儿方式与儿童情绪和行为问题之间的关联，其起源主要是共同环境，根据比较标准家庭环境模型与儿童效应模型的研究。然而，研究需要适当地比较所有的理论观点。本文讨论了这一点，并指出在建模效果时考虑基于理论的特异性的重要性。
