• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策科学:提升公共卫生预算的科学方法。

Decision science: a scientific approach to enhance public health budgeting.

机构信息

University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):98-103. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c87ace.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c87ace
PMID:20150789
Abstract

The allocation of resources for public health programming is a complicated and daunting responsibility. Financial decision-making processes within public health agencies are especially difficult when not supported with techniques for prioritizing and ranking alternatives. This article presents a case study of a decision analysis software model that was applied to the process of identifying funding priorities for public health services in the Spokane Regional Health District. Results on the use of this decision support system provide insights into how decision science models, which have been used for decades in business and industry, can be successfully applied to public health budgeting as a means of strengthening agency financial management processes.

摘要

公共卫生规划的资源分配是一项复杂而艰巨的责任。如果没有用于确定优先顺序和对备选方案进行排序的技术,公共卫生机构的财务决策过程尤其困难。本文介绍了一个决策分析软件模型的案例研究,该模型应用于确定斯波坎地区卫生区公共卫生服务的资金优先事项的过程。关于使用此决策支持系统的结果提供了有关见解,即数十年来在企业和行业中使用的决策科学模型如何成功地应用于公共卫生预算编制,作为加强机构财务管理流程的一种手段。

相似文献

1
Decision science: a scientific approach to enhance public health budgeting.决策科学:提升公共卫生预算的科学方法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):98-103. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c87ace.
2
Combining the benefits of decision science and financial analysis in public health management: a county-specific budgeting and planning model.整合决策科学与财务分析在公共卫生管理中的优势:一种针对特定县的预算编制与规划模型
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):406-12. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200409000-00006.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
ZBB--a new skill for the financial manager.零基预算编制法——财务经理的一项新技能。
Hosp Financ Manage. 1979 Mar;33(3):27-8, 31-3.
5
Data mining and visualization for decision support and modeling of public health-care resources.用于公共卫生保健资源决策支持与建模的数据挖掘和可视化。
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Aug;40(4):438-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Nov 10.
6
Estimating the financial resources needed for local public health departments in Minnesota: a multimethod approach.估算明尼苏达州地方公共卫生部门所需的财政资源:多方法途径。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Sep-Oct;17(5):413-20. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182053f04.
7
Integrating capital budgeting techniques.
Health Care Strateg Manage. 1993 Feb;11(2):7-10.
8
Priority setting in practice: what is the best way to compare costs and benefits?实践中的优先级设定:比较成本与效益的最佳方法是什么?
Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):467-78. doi: 10.1002/hec.1380.
9
[Systems analysis and modeling of organizational management processes of the regional public health system].[区域公共卫生系统组织管理流程的系统分析与建模]
Med Tekh. 2002 Nov-Dec(6):40-4.
10
Programming, budgeting, and control in the North Carolina "Willie M." program: a case of public sector accountability.
J Health Soc Policy. 1991;2(3):69-83. doi: 10.1300/J045v02n03_05.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Priorities of Local Health Departments in California: A Mixed Methods Study.审视加利福尼亚州地方卫生部门的工作重点:一项混合方法研究。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(3):384-391. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002082. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
The Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources: A Comparative Study From Jordan.稀缺医疗资源的公平分配:来自约旦的比较研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 12;7:603406. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.603406. eCollection 2020.
3
'Real-world' health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature.
使用明确决策标准进行“真实世界”医疗保健优先排序:文献系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 17;15:164. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0814-3.
4
Budget- and priority-setting criteria at state health agencies in times of austerity: a mixed-methods study.在紧缩时期,州卫生机构的预算和优先事项设定标准:一项混合方法研究。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):1092-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301732. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
5
Local legal infrastructure and population health.地方法律基础设施与人群健康。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):1936-41. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300656. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
6
From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking.从疗效到公平:资源配置和医疗保健决策的决策标准文献综述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012 Jul 18;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-9.
7
Environmental risks to public health in the United Arab Emirates: a quantitative assessment and strategic plan.阿联酋公共健康的环境风险:定量评估与战略规划。
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 May;120(5):681-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104064. Epub 2012 Feb 22.