Takatori Yoshio, Ito Kazuya, Sofue Muroto, Hirota Yoshio, Itoman Moritoshi, Matsumoto Tadami, Hamada Yoshiki, Shindo Hiroyuki, Yamada Harumoto, Yasunaga Yuji, Ito Hiroshi, Mori Satoshi, Owan Ichiro, Fujii Genji, Ohashi Hirotsugu, Mawatari Taro, Iga Toshiro, Takahira Naonobu, Sugimori Tanzo, Sugiyama Hajime, Okano Kunihiko, Karita Tatsuro, Ando Kenichi, Hamaki Takanari, Hirayama Teruhisa, Iwata Ken, Matsuura Masanori, Jingushi Seiya
Division of Science for Joint Reconstruction, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Jan;15(1):14-9. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1412-1. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
We are planning a multicenter survey on coxarthrosis and acetabular dysplasia in Japan. To collect reliable data, we performed a preliminary study to elucidate the observer agreement on assessment items.
We collected radiographs of hip joints in eight patients with various findings of coxarthrosis. Twelve registered orthopedic specialists evaluated them regarding the roentgenographic stage of coxarthrosis and five indexes of acetabular dysplasia (acetabular angle, center-edge angle, acetabular roof obliquity, acetabular head quotient, approximate acetabular quotient). To assess observer agreement, we calculated the value of the kappa statistic for stages and the coefficient of variation for the indexes. The same 12 specialists then assessed the coxarthritis stage on the same radiographs 1 month after the first evaluation based on our own descriptions of the roentgenographic stages.
For the first evaluation of the roentgenographic stage, the value of the kappa statistic was 0.448; and for the second evaluation it was 0.600. The results of the coefficient of variation for the indexes of acetabular dysplasia, ranked in ascending order, were as follows: acetabular angle, acetabular head quotient, acetabular roof obliquity, center-edge angle, approximate acetabular quotient.
For the upcoming multicenter survey, clear descriptions of the stages of coxarthrosis and selection of appropriate indexes can be helpful for collecting dependable results.
我们正在计划一项关于日本髋关节骨性关节炎和髋臼发育不良的多中心调查。为了收集可靠的数据,我们进行了一项初步研究以阐明评估项目上的观察者一致性。
我们收集了8例有各种髋关节骨性关节炎表现患者的髋关节X线片。12名注册骨科专家对这些X线片的髋关节骨性关节炎的X线分期以及髋臼发育不良的5项指标(髋臼角、中心边缘角、髋臼顶倾斜度、髋臼头商、近似髋臼商)进行评估。为了评估观察者一致性,我们计算了分期的kappa统计值和各指标的变异系数。然后,同样的12名专家在首次评估1个月后,根据我们对X线分期的描述,再次对相同的X线片评估髋关节骨性关节炎分期。
对于X线分期的首次评估,kappa统计值为0.448;第二次评估为0.600。髋臼发育不良各指标变异系数的结果按升序排列如下:髋臼角、髋臼头商、髋臼顶倾斜度、中心边缘角、近似髋臼商。
对于即将开展的多中心调查,清晰描述髋关节骨性关节炎的分期以及选择合适的指标有助于收集可靠的结果。