Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 6;15(4):e0231001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231001. eCollection 2020.
Whether borderline hip dysplasia is pathologic remains unclear. In order to evaluate the three-dimensional joint congruity, this study sought to answer the question: are borderline dysplastic hip curvature mismatch and eccentricity between the acetabulum and the femoral head different from dysplastic or control hips three-dimensionally? The 113 hips, categorized as: dysplastic (LCEA ≤ 20°), 47 hips; borderline (20° ≤ LCEA < 25°), 32 hips; and control (25° ≤ LCEA < 35°), 34 hips; were evaluated. Three-dimensional (3D) femoral and coxal bone models were reconstructed from CT images. Using a custom-written Visual C++ routine, the femoral head and acetabular radii of curvature, and the femoral head and the acetabular curvature center were calculated. Then the ratio of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius (3D curvature mismatch ratio), and the distance between the acetabular curvature center and the femoral head center (3D center discrepancy distance) were calculated. These indices were compared statistically among the three groups using Tukey's post hoc test. The mean 3D curvature mismatch ratio in the borderline (1.13 ± 0.05) was smaller than in the dysplasia (1.23 ± 0.08, p < 0.001), and larger than in the control (1.07 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). The mean 3D center discrepancy distance in the borderline (3.2 ± 1.4 mm) was smaller than in the dysplasia (4.8 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) and larger than in the control (1.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). These results demonstrated that three-dimensional congruity of the borderline dysplastic hip is impaired, but its incongruity is not as severe as in dysplastic hips. The 3D curvature mismatch ratio and the 3D center discrepancy distance can be valuable signs of joint congruity in patients with borderline dysplasia. However, future studies are necessary to clarify any associations between curvature mismatch and pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in borderline dysplasia.
是否存在边界型髋关节发育不良仍然不清楚。为了评估关节的三维吻合度,本研究旨在回答以下问题:边界型髋关节的髋臼和股骨头曲率不匹配以及偏心距是否与发育不良或正常髋关节在三维上存在差异?将 113 个髋关节分为发育不良组(LCEA≤20°)47 个髋关节,边界型组(20°≤LCEA<25°)32 个髋关节和对照组(25°≤LCEA<35°)34 个髋关节。通过 CT 图像重建三维(3D)股骨和骨盆骨骼模型。使用定制的 Visual C++ 程序,计算股骨头和髋臼的曲率半径以及股骨头和髋臼曲率中心。然后计算髋臼半径与股骨头半径的比值(3D 曲率不匹配比)以及髋臼曲率中心与股骨头中心的距离(3D 中心差异距离)。使用 Tukey 事后检验对三组间的这些指标进行统计学比较。边界型组的平均 3D 曲率不匹配比(1.13±0.05)小于发育不良组(1.23±0.08,p<0.001),大于对照组(1.07±0.02,p<0.001)。边界型组的平均 3D 中心差异距离(3.2±1.4mm)小于发育不良组(4.8±2.3,p<0.001),大于对照组(1.6±0.7,p<0.001)。这些结果表明,边界型髋关节发育不良的三维吻合度受损,但其不匹配程度不如发育不良髋关节严重。3D 曲率不匹配比和 3D 中心差异距离可作为边界型髋关节发育不良患者关节吻合度的有价值指标。然而,需要进一步的研究来阐明边界型髋关节发育不良的曲率不匹配与骨关节炎发病机制之间的任何关联。