Suppr超能文献

单眼植入渐变折射多焦点或单件式单焦点人工晶状体后的视觉功能:随机前瞻性比较。

Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens Randomized prospective comparison.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266003, China.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):282-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.037.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare visual function after phacoemulsification with implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) or a monofocal IOL.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

METHODS

This study comprised patients with unilateral cataract who had phacoemulsification with implantation of an AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 multifocal IOL (multifocal group) or an AcrySof SA60AT single-piece monofocal IOL (monofocal group). Postoperative visual function, including uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity; uncorrected (UNVA), corrected (CNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuity; and contrast sensitivity were evaluated 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient-reported vision and spectacle independence in the 2 groups were also compared.

RESULTS

Of the 161 eyes, 72 were in the multifocal group and 89 were in the monofocal group. The multifocal group had statistically significant better UNVA than the monofocal group from 1 week postoperatively to the final follow-up and statistically significant better CNVA at 6 months (both P<.05). There were no statistically significant differences in UDVA or CDVA between the 2 groups over the 6-month follow-up. The multifocal group had statistically significantly better pseudoaccommodation than the monofocal group; the monofocal group had significantly better contrast sensitivity (both P<.05). Patients with the multifocal IOL reported being more satisfied than those with the monofocal IOL.

CONCLUSIONS

The multifocal IOL provided better near visual acuity and more spectacle independence than the monofocal IOL.

摘要

目的

比较白内障超声乳化吸除术后植入多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)与单焦点 IOL 的视觉功能。

设置

中国山东青岛大学医学院附属医院眼科。

方法

本研究纳入了接受白内障超声乳化吸除术联合 AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 多焦点 IOL(多焦点组)或 AcrySof SA60AT 单件式单焦点 IOL(单焦点组)植入的单侧白内障患者。术后 1 周、1 个月和 6 个月评估术后视觉功能,包括未矫正(UDVA)和矫正(CDVA)远视力;未矫正(UNVA)、矫正(CNVA)和远距矫正近视力;对比敏感度。还比较了两组患者的报告视力和对眼镜的依赖程度。

结果

在 161 只眼中,72 只眼在多焦点组,89 只眼在单焦点组。多焦点组术后 1 周至最终随访时的 UNVA 显著优于单焦点组,6 个月时的 CNVA 也显著优于单焦点组(均 P<.05)。6 个月随访期间,两组间 UDVA 或 CDVA 无统计学差异。多焦点组的假性调节功能明显优于单焦点组,单焦点组的对比敏感度明显优于多焦点组(均 P<.05)。多焦点 IOL 组患者的满意度明显高于单焦点 IOL 组。

结论

多焦点 IOL 提供了更好的近视力和更多的眼镜独立性,优于单焦点 IOL。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验