Physiology and Behaviour Laboratory, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Schorenstrasse 16, 8603 Schwerzenbach, Switzerland.
Physiol Behav. 2010 Apr 19;99(5):592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
Blood is routinely sampled from laboratory animals in biomedical research, and many of the commonly applied sampling techniques require anesthesia. Acute effects of many sampling and anesthesia procedures may confound the results, but those effects are incompletely characterized. We here compare the effects of four common anesthesia procedures (inhalation anesthesia with ether (EA) or isoflurane (IA) and intraperitoneal injection anesthesia with xylazin/ketamine (XKA) or medetomidine/midazolam/fentanyl (MMFA)) on plasma concentrations of glucose, lactate, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs), and corticosterone in blood obtained from a previously implanted jugular vein (JV) catheter with the effect of JV blood sampling from non-anesthetized, freely-moving rats (JV-NA). Also, we included in the comparison two other blood sampling procedures usually performed without anesthesia (NA), i.e., puncture of the saphenic vein (SV) and tail incision (TI). Whereas the control procedure (JV-NA) did not significantly affect any of the target parameters, plasma glucose increased from 14 (JV-IA) to 44 (JV-MMFA) % (all Ps=0.05 when compared with the control procedure) in all blood samples collected in anesthesia and was 12 and 14% lower (both Ps<0.05) in SV-NA and TI-NA samples, respectively. Plasma lactate increased from 74 (JV-IA) to 226% (SV-NA) (all Ps<0.05) with all sampling and anesthesia procedures except for JV-XKA and JV-MMF. Plasma NEFAs increased to 52% (P<0.05) with the TI-NA procedure and appeared to decrease with the JV-IA and JV-MMFA procedures (both Ps>0.05). Finally, only the JV-EA and the JV-MMFA procedures increased plasma corticosterone (+525 and +353%, respectively, both Ps< 0.05). The JV-IA and JV-XKA procedures appeared to increase it as well, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Thus, anesthesia and blood sampling procedures can have profound acute effects on plasma metabolite and hormone concentrations. This must be considered for the design and interpretation of blood sampling experiments in laboratory animals.
在生物医学研究中,通常从实验室动物中采集血液样本,许多常用的采样技术都需要麻醉。许多采样和麻醉程序的急性影响可能会混淆结果,但这些影响尚未完全描述。我们在此比较了四种常见的麻醉程序(乙醚(EA)或异氟烷(IA)吸入麻醉和盐酸二甲苯胺/氯胺酮(XKA)或盐酸咪达唑仑/地西泮/芬太尼(MMFA)腹膜内注射麻醉)对先前植入颈静脉(JV)导管的血液中葡萄糖、乳酸、非酯化脂肪酸(NEFA)和皮质酮浓度的影响,以及非麻醉、自由活动的大鼠(JV-NA)从颈静脉采集血液的效果。此外,我们还将两种通常在没有麻醉的情况下进行的其他血液采样程序(NA)纳入比较,即穿刺隐静脉(SV)和尾部切口(TI)。尽管对照程序(JV-NA)并未显著影响任何目标参数,但在所有麻醉下采集的血液样本中,血浆葡萄糖分别从 14%(JV-IA)增加到 44%(JV-MMFA)(与对照程序相比,所有 Ps=0.05),在 SV-NA 和 TI-NA 样本中分别降低了 12%和 14%(均 Ps<0.05)。除 JV-XKA 和 JV-MMF 外,所有采样和麻醉程序均使血浆乳酸从 74%(JV-IA)增加到 226%(SV-NA)(均 Ps<0.05)。血浆 NEFA 增加到 52%(P<0.05)与 TI-NA 程序,并且似乎随着 JV-IA 和 JV-MMFA 程序而降低(均 Ps>0.05)。最后,只有 JV-EA 和 JV-MMFA 程序增加了血浆皮质酮(分别增加 525%和 353%,均 Ps<0.05)。JV-IA 和 JV-XKA 程序似乎也增加了皮质酮,但这些差异没有达到统计学意义。因此,麻醉和采样程序会对血浆代谢物和激素浓度产生深远的急性影响。在实验室动物的血液采样实验的设计和解释中必须考虑到这一点。