Christensen S D, Mikkelsen L F, Fels J J, Bodvarsdóttir T B, Hansen A K
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 88, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Lab Anim. 2009 Jan;43(1):65-71. doi: 10.1258/la.2008.007075. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
For oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in mice, multiple blood samples need to be taken within a few hours from conscious mice. Today, a number of essential parameters may be analysed on very small amounts of plasma, thus reducing the number of animals to be used. It is, however, crucial to obtain high-quality plasma or serum in order to avoid increased data variation and thereby increased group sizes. The aim of this study was to find the most valid and reproducible method for withdrawal of blood samples when performing OGTT. Four methods, i.e. amputation of the tail tip, lateral tail incision, puncture of the tail tip and periorbital puncture, were selected for testing at 21 degrees C and 30 degrees C after a pilot study. For each method, four blood samples were drawn from C57BL/6 mice at 30 min intervals. The presence of clots was registered, haemolysis was monitored spectrophotometrically at 430 nm, and it was noted whether it was possible to achieve 30-50 microL blood. Furthermore, a small amount of extra blood was sampled before and after the four samplings for testing of whether the sampling induced a blood glucose change over the 90 min test period. All methods resulted in acceptable amounts of plasma. Clots were observed in a sparse number of samples with no significant differences between the methods. Periorbital puncture did not lead to any haemolysed samples at all, and lateral tail incision resulted in only a few haemolysed samples, while puncture or amputation of the tail tip induced haemolysis in a significant number of samples. All methods, except for puncture of the tail tip, influenced blood glucose. Periorbital puncture resulted in a dramatic increase in blood glucose of up to 3.5 mmol/L indicating that it is stressful. Although lateral tail incision also had some impact on blood glucose, it seems to be the method of choice for OGTT, as it is likely to produce a clot-free non-haemolysed sample, while periorbital sampling, although producing a high quality of sample, induces such a dramatic change in blood glucose that it should not be applied for OGTT in mice.
对于小鼠的口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),需要在数小时内从清醒的小鼠身上采集多个血样。如今,可对极少量血浆进行多项重要参数分析,从而减少所用动物数量。然而,获取高质量的血浆或血清至关重要,以避免数据变异增加,进而避免增加样本量。本研究的目的是找到在进行OGTT时采集血样的最有效且可重复的方法。经过初步研究,选择了四种方法,即尾尖截肢、尾侧切口、尾尖穿刺和眶周穿刺,在21摄氏度和30摄氏度下进行测试。对于每种方法,每隔30分钟从C57BL/6小鼠身上采集四个血样。记录是否有凝血块,用分光光度法在430nm处监测溶血情况,并记录是否能够采集到30 - 50微升血液。此外,在四次采样前后采集少量额外血液,以测试采样在90分钟测试期内是否会引起血糖变化。所有方法都能得到可接受量的血浆。在少量样本中观察到有凝血块,各方法之间无显著差异。眶周穿刺根本不会导致任何溶血样本,尾侧切口仅导致少量溶血样本,而尾尖穿刺或截肢会在相当数量的样本中引起溶血。除尾尖穿刺外,所有方法都会影响血糖。眶周穿刺导致血糖急剧升高,高达3.5mmol/L,表明该方法具有应激性。虽然尾侧切口对血糖也有一定影响,但它似乎是OGTT的首选方法,因为它可能产生无凝血块、不溶血的样本,而眶周采样虽然能得到高质量的样本,但会引起血糖如此剧烈的变化,以至于不应用于小鼠的OGTT。