McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, One Stewart Street, Suite 309, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Chem Biol Interact. 2010 Mar 19;184(1-2):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
Mode of action is defined as a series of key biological events leading to an observed toxicological effect (for example, metabolism to a toxic entity, cell death, regenerative repair and tumors). It contrasts with mechanism of action, which generally involves a detailed understanding of the molecular basis for an effect. A framework to consider the weight of evidence for hypothesized modes of action in animals and their relevance to humans, has been widely adopted and used by government agencies and international organizations. The framework, developed and refined through its application in case studies for principally non-DNA-reactive carcinogens, has more recently been extended to DNA-reactive carcinogens, non-cancer endpoints and different life stages. In addition to increasing transparency, use of the framework promotes consistency in decision-making concerning adequacy of weight of evidence, facilitates peer input and review and identifies critical research needs. The framework provides an effective tool to facilitate discussion between the research and risk assessment communities on critical data gaps, which if filled, would permit more refined estimates of risk. As a basis for additionally coordinating and focusing research on critical data gaps in a risk assessment context, five key events in the mode of action for benzene-induced leukemia are proposed: (1) benzene metabolism via Cytochrome P450, (2) the interaction of benzene metabolites with target cells in the bone marrow, (3) formation of initiated, mutated target cells, (4) selective proliferation of the mutated cells and (5) production of leukemia. These key events are considered in a framework analysis of human relevance as a basis to consider appropriate next steps in developing research strategies.
作用模式被定义为一系列导致观察到的毒理学效应的关键生物事件(例如,代谢为有毒实体、细胞死亡、再生修复和肿瘤)。它与作用机制形成对比,后者通常涉及对效应的分子基础的详细了解。一个用于考虑假设的动物作用模式的证据权重及其与人类的相关性的框架已被广泛采用和应用于政府机构和国际组织。该框架通过在主要非 DNA 反应性致癌剂的案例研究中应用得到了开发和完善,最近已扩展到 DNA 反应性致癌剂、非癌症终点和不同生命阶段。除了提高透明度外,该框架还促进了在关于证据权重充足性的决策方面的一致性,有助于同行的投入和审查,并确定了关键的研究需求。该框架提供了一个有效的工具,以促进研究和风险评估界之间关于关键数据差距的讨论,如果填补了这些差距,将允许更精确地估计风险。作为在风险评估背景下额外协调和集中研究关键数据差距的基础,提出了苯致白血病作用模式中的五个关键事件:(1)通过细胞色素 P450 代谢苯,(2)苯代谢物与骨髓中靶细胞的相互作用,(3)起始、突变靶细胞的形成,(4)突变细胞的选择性增殖,(5)白血病的产生。这些关键事件在人类相关性的框架分析中被考虑,作为制定研究策略的适当下一步的基础。