• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水剥夺大鼠中氟哌啶醇的剂量依赖性分离作用对运动、食欲反应和摄食行为的影响。

Dose-dependent dissociable effects of haloperidol on locomotion, appetitive responses, and consummatory behavior in water-deprived rats.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Fo Guang University, Yilan County 26247, Taiwan.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010 May;95(3):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.pbb.2010.02.003
PMID:20153357
Abstract

UNLABELLED

We studied whether a cascade of different phases of ingestive behavior were governed by different doses of the dopamine D2 receptor system. A wide spectrum of doses (0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4mg/kg) of a D2 receptor antagonist, haloperidol, were administered to 6 groups of water-deprived rats. 45min following administration of the drug a 15min water intake session was allowed to assess the effect on (a) locomotion, (b) appetitive response and (c) consummatory responses. The procedure was repeated for 5days.

RESULTS

The doses of 0.025 to 0.1mg/kg had no effects on any measured behavior compared with the control group. The 0.2mg/kg dose induced catalepsy during sessions 3 and 5 and impaired consummatory (decreased lick numbers and intake volume) behaviors during sessions 1-5. The 0.4mg/kg dose affected appetitive behavior (increased latency to contact the water tube) during session 2 and consummatory behavior during all five water sessions. The 0.2mg/kg dose appeared to dissociate appetitive and consummatory behavior, and the 0.4mg/kg dose locomotor activity and motivational behavior (including consummatory and appetitive responses). These results, that the three elements of ingestive behavior (locomotion, appetitive responses, and consummatory behavior) have different sensitivity to haloperidol, suggest that separable D2 mechanisms are involved in governing the ingestive behavior.

摘要

未加标签

我们研究了不同剂量的多巴胺 D2 受体系统是否控制了不同阶段的摄食行为。给 6 组缺水的大鼠注射了广泛剂量范围(0、0.025、0.05、0.1、0.2 和 0.4mg/kg)的 D2 受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇。在药物给药后 45 分钟,允许进行 15 分钟的水摄入测试,以评估其对(a)运动、(b)食欲反应和(c)摄取反应的影响。该程序重复进行了 5 天。

结果

与对照组相比,0.025 至 0.1mg/kg 的剂量对任何测量的行为均无影响。0.2mg/kg 的剂量在第 3 天和第 5 天引起了僵住,并在第 1 天至第 5 天期间损害了摄取行为(减少舔的次数和摄入量)。0.4mg/kg 的剂量在第 2 天影响了食欲行为(接触水喉的潜伏期延长),在所有 5 个水测试期间影响了摄取行为。0.2mg/kg 的剂量似乎使食欲和摄取行为分离,0.4mg/kg 的剂量使运动活动和动机行为(包括摄取和食欲反应)分离。这些结果表明,摄食行为的三个要素(运动、食欲反应和摄取行为)对氟哌啶醇的敏感性不同,表明参与摄食行为调节的是可分离的 D2 机制。

相似文献

1
Dose-dependent dissociable effects of haloperidol on locomotion, appetitive responses, and consummatory behavior in water-deprived rats.水剥夺大鼠中氟哌啶醇的剂量依赖性分离作用对运动、食欲反应和摄食行为的影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010 May;95(3):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
2
Ethanol- and sucrose-reinforced appetitive and consummatory responding in HAD1, HAD2, and P rats.乙醇和蔗糖强化的HAD1、HAD2和P大鼠的食欲及进食反应。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Nov;26(11):1653-61. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000036284.74513.A5.
3
Female Sprague-Dawley rats display greater appetitive and consummatory responses to alcohol.雌性斯普拉格-道利大鼠对酒精表现出更强的食欲和摄取反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jun 1;327:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
A novel IV cocaine self-administration procedure in rats: differential effects of dopamine, serotonin, and GABA drug pre-treatments on cocaine consumption and maximal price paid.一种新型 IV 可卡因自我给药程序在大鼠中的应用:多巴胺、血清素和 GABA 药物预处理对可卡因消费和最大支付价格的差异影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Mar;214(2):567-77. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2058-6. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
5
Effect of the dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in water-deprived rats licking for water and NaCl solutions.可乐定对饮水和 NaCl 溶液舔吸大鼠摄食行为微结构的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2012 Jan 18;105(2):230-3. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
6
Dopamine on D2-like receptors is involved in reward evaluation in water-deprived rats licking for NaCl and water.D2 样受体多巴胺参与了缺水大鼠舔盐和水的奖赏评估。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010 Aug;96(2):194-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 9.
7
Dopamine on D2-like receptors "reboosts" dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for sucrose.多巴胺 D2 样受体上的多巴胺“增强”了大鼠舔食蔗糖时多巴胺 D1 样受体介导的行为激活。
Neuropharmacology. 2010 Jun;58(7):1085-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
8
Selective serotonin receptor stimulation of the medial nucleus accumbens causes differential effects on food intake and locomotion.对伏隔核内侧进行选择性5-羟色胺受体刺激会对食物摄取和运动产生不同影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2009 Oct;123(5):1046-57. doi: 10.1037/a0016882.
9
Effects of SR141716A on ethanol and sucrose self-administration.SR141716A对乙醇和蔗糖自我给药的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 Feb;25(2):277-82.
10
Intake inhibition by NPY: role of appetitive ingestive behavior and aversion.神经肽Y对摄入量的抑制作用:食欲性行为和厌恶感的作用
Physiol Behav. 2002 Apr 1;75(4):567-75. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00648-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of dopamine D-like and D-like receptors in the activation of ingestive behaviour in thirsty rats licking for water.多巴胺 D 样和 D 样受体在口渴大鼠舔水时激活摄食行为中的作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Dec;236(12):3497-3512. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05317-w. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
2
Roles of NMDA and dopamine in food-foraging decision-making strategies of rats in the social setting.NMDA和多巴胺在社交环境中大鼠觅食决策策略中的作用。
BMC Neurosci. 2016 Jan 11;17:3. doi: 10.1186/s12868-015-0233-8.
3
Clozapine-induced locomotor suppression is mediated by 5-HT2A receptors in the forebrain.
氯氮平诱导的运动抑制是由前脑的 5-HT2A 受体介导的。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Dec;37(13):2747-55. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.139. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
4
The impact of antipsychotic drugs on food intake and body weight and on leptin levels in blood and hypothalamic ob-r leptin receptor expression in wistar rats.抗精神病药物对食物摄入和体重的影响以及对血液中瘦素水平和下丘脑 ob-r 瘦素受体表达的影响在 wistar 大鼠中的作用。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(9):885-94. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322010000900012.