Suppr超能文献

736 例需要肾脏替代治疗的危重症成人中血管通路对导管功能和透析效果的影响:一项随机对照研究。

Catheter dysfunction and dialysis performance according to vascular access among 736 critically ill adults requiring renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Côte de Nacre University Hospital Center, Caen, France.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1118-25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d454b3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare dialysis catheter function according to catheter site.

DESIGN

Multicenter, open, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Nine university-affiliated hospitals and three general hospitals in France.

PATIENTS

Seven hundred thirty-six patients in intensive care units who required a first venous catheterization to perform either intermittent hemodialysis (470 patients with 1275 sessions) or continuous renal replacement therapy (266 patients with 1003 days).

INTERVENTION

Patients randomly received either femoral (n = 370) or jugular (n = 366) catheterization. For the jugular site, right-side position (n = 252) was recommended.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Time to catheter ablation for dysfunction, urea reduction ratio (intermittent hemodialysis), and downtime (continuous renal replacement therapy) were assessed for all participants and evaluated by randomly assigned catheterization site (femoral or jugular). Baseline demography and dialysis prescriptions were similar between the site arms. In modified intent-to-treat, catheter dysfunction occurred in 36 of 348 (10.3%) and 38 of 342 (11.1%) patients in the femoral and jugular groups, respectively. The risk of catheter dysfunction did not significantly differ between randomized groups (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.68; p = .80). Compared to the femoral site, the observed risk of dysfunction decreased in the right jugular position (15 of 226; 6.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-1.07; p = .09) and significantly increased in the left jugular position (23 of 118; 19.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.21; p < .02). The postintermittent hemodialysis mean urea reduction ratio per session was 50.8% (standard deviation, 16.1) for femoral vs. 52.8% (standard deviation, 15.8) for jugular (p = .30) sites, and the median continuous renal replacement therapy downtime per patient-day was 1.17 hrs (interquartile range, 0.75-1.50) for both sites (p = .98).

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of catheter dysfunction and dialysis performance among critically ill adults requiring acute renal replacement therapy, jugular site did not significantly outperform femoral site placement.

摘要

目的

比较导管部位对透析导管功能的影响。

设计

多中心、开放、随机对照试验。

地点

法国 9 所大学附属医院和 3 所综合医院。

患者

736 名入住重症监护病房、需要首次静脉置管以进行间歇性血液透析(470 名患者,1275 次)或连续肾脏替代治疗(266 名患者,1003 天)的患者。

干预措施

患者随机接受股静脉(n = 370)或颈内静脉(n = 366)置管。对于颈内静脉置管部位,建议采用右侧卧位(n = 252)。

测量和主要结果

所有患者均评估导管消融不良、尿素清除率(间歇性血液透析)和停机时间(连续肾脏替代治疗)的时间,并根据随机分配的导管部位(股静脉或颈内静脉)进行评估。股静脉和颈内静脉组患者的基础人口统计学和透析方案相似。在改良意向治疗中,股静脉组和颈内静脉组分别有 36 例(10.3%)和 38 例(11.1%)患者发生导管功能障碍。随机分组之间导管功能障碍的风险无显著差异(风险比,1.06;95%置信区间,0.67-1.68;p =.80)。与股静脉部位相比,右颈内静脉位置的观察到的功能障碍风险降低(226 例中有 15 例,6.6%;调整风险比,0.58;95%置信区间,0.31-1.07;p =.09),左颈内静脉位置的观察到的功能障碍风险显著增加(118 例中有 23 例,19.5%;调整风险比,1.89;95%置信区间,1.12-3.21;p <.02)。股静脉组和颈内静脉组每 session 的平均间歇性血液透析尿素清除率分别为 50.8%(标准差,16.1)和 52.8%(标准差,15.8)(p =.30),每例患者的连续肾脏替代治疗停机时间中位数分别为 1.17 小时(四分位距,0.75-1.50)(p =.98)。

结论

在需要急性肾脏替代治疗的危重症成人中,导管功能和透析性能方面,颈内静脉部位并不明显优于股静脉部位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验