• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

委员会报告:用于评估新生儿和儿童人群筛查候选条件的方法。

Committee report: Method for evaluating conditions nominated for population-based screening of newborns and children.

机构信息

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2010 Mar;12(3):153-9. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d2af04.

DOI:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d2af04
PMID:20154628
Abstract

The Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children is charged with evaluating conditions nominated for addition to the uniform screening panel and consequently making recommendations to the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services. This report describes the framework by which the committee approaches its task. Key decision nodes include initial review of every nomination to determine whether conditions are amenable for systematic evidence review, review of systematic evidence reviews conducted by the committee's external review group, and deliberation and formal recommendation for addition or exclusion to the uniform panel. Data analyzed include the accuracy and specificity of screening and diagnostic tests for nominated disorders, the extent of predicted health benefits, harms impact on disease course, and cost from early diagnosis and treatment. The committee process is guided by approaches used by similar entities, but more flexible criteria are sometimes needed to accommodate data limitations stemming from the rarity of many of these conditions. Possible outcomes of committee review range from recommendation to add a nominated condition to the uniform panel; provide feedback on specific gaps in evidence that must be addressed before making a decision; or rejection of a nomination (e.g., because of identified harms). The committee's structured evidence-based assessment of nominated conditions supports a consistently rigorous, iterative and transparent approach to its making recommendations regarding broad population-based screening programs for rare conditions in infants and children.

摘要

美国卫生与公众服务部部长顾问委员会负责评估候选新增疾病,并向部长提出建议。本报告描述了委员会完成任务的方法。主要决策节点包括:初次审查每个候选疾病,以确定其是否适合系统的证据审查;审查委员会外部审查组进行的系统证据审查;以及对新增或排除统一筛查项目进行审议和正式建议。分析的数据包括筛查和诊断测试的准确性和特异性、预测健康收益的程度、对疾病进程的影响以及早期诊断和治疗的成本。委员会的决策过程遵循类似机构使用的方法,但有时需要更灵活的标准来适应这些罕见疾病数据有限的情况。委员会审查的可能结果包括:建议将候选疾病列入统一筛查项目;就必须解决的证据具体差距提供反馈,然后再做出决定;或拒绝提名(例如,由于发现的危害)。委员会对候选疾病进行的结构化循证评估,为其就婴儿和儿童罕见疾病的广泛人群筛查项目提出建议提供了一种始终如一的严格、迭代和透明的方法。

相似文献

1
Committee report: Method for evaluating conditions nominated for population-based screening of newborns and children.委员会报告:用于评估新生儿和儿童人群筛查候选条件的方法。
Genet Med. 2010 Mar;12(3):153-9. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d2af04.
2
Decision-making process for conditions nominated to the recommended uniform screening panel: statement of the US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children.被提名列入推荐统一筛查小组的条件的决策过程:美国卫生与公众服务部部长遗传性新生儿和儿童疾病咨询委员会的声明。
Genet Med. 2014 Feb;16(2):183-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.98. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Evaluating Harms in the Assessment of Net Benefit: A Framework for Newborn Screening Condition Review.评估净效益时对危害的评估:新生儿筛查疾病审查框架
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Mar;20(3):693-700. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1869-9.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
From developing guidelines to implementing legislation: actions of the US Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children toward advancing and improving newborn screening.从制定指南到实施立法:美国新生儿和儿童遗传性疾病咨询委员会在推进和改善新生儿筛查方面的行动。
Semin Perinatol. 2010 Apr;34(2):121-4. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.12.004.
6
Succinylacetone as primary marker to detect tyrosinemia type I in newborns and its measurement by newborn screening programs.琥珀酰丙酮作为检测新生儿I型酪氨酸血症的主要标志物及其在新生儿筛查项目中的测定。
Mol Genet Metab. 2014 Sep-Oct;113(1-2):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
7
Committee Report: advancing the current recommended panel of conditions for newborn screening.委员会报告:推进当前推荐的新生儿筛查疾病清单
Genet Med. 2007 Nov;9(11):792-6. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e318159a38e.
8
Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children response to the President's Council on Bioethics report: the changing moral focus of newborn screening.新生儿及儿童遗传性疾病问题秘书咨询委员会对总统生物伦理委员会报告的回应:新生儿筛查中不断变化的道德焦点
Genet Med. 2011 Apr;13(4):301-4. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318210655d.
9
Newborn screening: education, consent, and the residual blood spot. The position of the national society of genetic counselors.新生儿筛查:教育、知情同意与残留血斑。美国国家遗传咨询师协会立场声明
J Genet Couns. 2014 Feb;23(1):16-9. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9631-1. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
10
Including the initial newborn screening bloodspot collection device serial number on birth certificates: basis and recommendations from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children.在出生证明上包括初始新生儿筛查采血设备序列号:卫生与公众服务部遗传性新生儿和儿童疾病咨询委员会的依据和建议。
Genet Med. 2013 Mar;15(3):229-33. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.121. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
CFTR haplotype phasing using long-read genome sequencing from ultralow input DNA.使用来自超低输入DNA的长读长基因组测序进行CFTR单倍型分型。
Genet Med Open. 2025 Jan 7;3:101962. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2025.101962. eCollection 2025.
2
Charting the Ethical Frontier in Newborn Screening Research: Insights from the NBSTRN ELSI Researcher Needs Survey.绘制新生儿筛查研究中的伦理前沿:来自新生儿筛查转化研究网络(NBSTRN)伦理、法律与社会问题(ELSI)研究者需求调查的见解
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Sep 19;10(3):64. doi: 10.3390/ijns10030064.
3
Wilson and Jungner Revisited: Are Screening Criteria Fit for the 21st Century?
重温威尔逊和荣格纳:筛查标准是否适用于21世纪?
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Sep 13;10(3):62. doi: 10.3390/ijns10030062.
4
A Qualitative Study on Engaged Families' Experiences with Long-Term Follow-Up Care in the Colorado/Wyoming Newborn Screening System.一项关于科罗拉多州/怀俄明州新生儿筛查系统中参与家庭长期随访护理经历的定性研究。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Sep 11;10(3):61. doi: 10.3390/ijns10030061.
5
Iowa Newborn Screening Program Experience with Hemoglobinopathy Screening over the Last Two Decades and Its Increasing Global Relevance.爱荷华州新生儿筛查项目在过去二十年中进行血红蛋白病筛查的经验及其日益增长的全球相关性。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Mar 8;10(1):21. doi: 10.3390/ijns10010021.
6
ScreenPlus: A comprehensive, multi-disorder newborn screening program.ScreenPlus:一项全面的多病症新生儿筛查计划。
Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2023 Dec 14;38:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2023.101037. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Implementation of Newborn Screening for Conditions in the United States First Recommended during 2010-2018.2010 - 2018年期间首次建议在美国开展的针对特定病症的新生儿筛查实施情况。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023 Apr 6;9(2):20. doi: 10.3390/ijns9020020.
8
The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening.美国新生儿筛查的进展与未来
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022 Jul 18;8(3):41. doi: 10.3390/ijns8030041.
9
Application of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in newborn screening efficiently identifies inborn disorders of neonates.应用新一代测序(NGS) panel 于新生儿筛检可有效鉴定新生儿的先天疾病。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Feb 21;17(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02231-x.
10
A Systematic Review and Recommendations Around Frameworks for Evaluating Scientific Validity in Nutritional Genomics.关于营养基因组学中科学有效性评估框架的系统评价与建议
Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 14;8:789215. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.789215. eCollection 2021.