Suppr超能文献

局麻药中加入血管收缩剂对两种黏接系统在体人牙本质微拉伸黏接强度的影响。

The influence of a local anesthetic containing vasoconstrictor on microtensile bond strengths of two adhesive systems to human dentin in situ.

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Rajthewee, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2010 Feb;12(1):11-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17531.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the bond strengths of an etch-and-rinse adhesive and a self-etching adhesive to human dentin in vitro and under two in situ conditions: non-anesthetization and anesthetization of the teeth with a local anesthetic containing vasoconstrictor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An in situ study was performed on 49 maxillary premolars scheduled for extraction due to orthodontic reasons. For the bond strength test, occlusal cavities were prepared either with or without a local anesthetic containing vasoconstrictor. The cavities were bonded with Adper Single Bond or Clearfil SE Bond and filled with a resin composite, Filtek Z250. The teeth were then extracted, sectioned, trimmed, and tested for microtensile bond strength. For the observation of dentin surfaces, 20 premolars were used. The impressions of the cavity floors in the anesthetized and non-anesthetized groups were taken before and after acid etching. The replicas were observed under a scanning electron microscope. In vitro, the bond strength test and the SEM observation were also carried out on 24 extracted premolars with the same procedures used in the in situ study.

RESULTS

The bond strengths of the two adhesives bonded to dentin in situ were significantly lower than those in vitro. When both adhesives were tested under in situ conditions, there were no significant differences between the bond strengths to dentin of anesthetized and non-anesthetized groups (p > 0.05). No fluid droplets were found on dentin on the cavity floor prepared in vitro, either before or after acid-etching. For the unetched dentin prepared in situ, fluid droplets were found and covered on the smear layer in anesthetized and non-anesthetized groups, but the droplets were slightly larger in the non-anesthetized group. In the non-anesthetized, acid-etched group, dentin surfaces were covered with coalescent dentinal fluid in most specimens. However, in the anesthetized, acid-etched group, patent tubules and some dentinal fluid were observed on the surfaces.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that in situ, dentinal fluid had a detrimental effect on the dentin bond strengths of an etch-and-rinse adhesive and a self-etching adhesive. However, reduction in dentinal fluid due to the effect of a local anesthetic containing vasoconstrictor did not improve the bond strengths in either adhesives.

摘要

目的

评估一种酸蚀冲洗型黏结剂和一种自酸蚀黏结剂与人体牙本质的黏结强度,并在两种原位条件下进行评估:牙齿未麻醉和牙齿用含血管收缩剂的局麻药麻醉。

材料和方法

一项原位研究共纳入 49 颗因正畸原因需拔除的上颌前磨牙。对于黏结强度测试,用或不用含血管收缩剂的局麻药制备窝洞。用 Adper Single Bond 或 Clearfil SE Bond 黏结,并用 Filtek Z250 树脂复合材料填充。然后将牙齿拔出、切割、修整,并进行微拉伸黏结强度测试。对于牙本质表面的观察,使用 20 颗前磨牙。在麻醉和非麻醉组中,分别在酸蚀前后取窝洞底部的印模。使用扫描电子显微镜观察复制件。在体外,还对 24 颗相同程序提取的前磨牙进行了黏结强度测试和 SEM 观察。

结果

两种黏结剂在原位黏结牙本质的黏结强度明显低于体外。当两种黏结剂在原位条件下进行测试时,麻醉组和非麻醉组牙本质黏结强度无显著差异(p > 0.05)。体外酸蚀前后,在窝洞底部制备的牙本质上均未发现液滴。对于原位制备的未酸蚀牙本质,在麻醉和非麻醉组中均发现并覆盖了玷污层上的液滴,但在非麻醉组中液滴稍大。在非麻醉、酸蚀组中,大多数标本的牙本质表面覆盖着融合的牙本质液。然而,在麻醉、酸蚀组中,表面观察到有开放的小管和一些牙本质液。

结论

本研究认为,原位牙本质液对酸蚀冲洗型黏结剂和自酸蚀黏结剂的牙本质黏结强度有不利影响。然而,含血管收缩剂的局麻药减少牙本质液并不能改善两种黏结剂的黏结强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验