Suppr超能文献

眼内异物穿孔伤或眼内异物严重伤行眼内容剜除术。

Chorioretinectomy for perforating or severe intraocular foreign body injuries.

机构信息

Ophthalmology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 6900 Georgia Avenue, Washington, DC, 20307, USA.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):319-30. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1236-x. Epub 2009 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To report the outcomes of chorioretinectomy versus non-chorioretinectomy in combat ocular injuries where a foreign body penetrated the choroid or perforated the globe.

METHODS

Retrospective, comparative, consecutive interventional case series of 32 perforating or severe intraocular foreign body combat ocular trauma injuries sustained by United States military soldiers and treated at a single institution from March 2003 to March 2009. Final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in 19 non-chorioretinectomy-treated eyes was compared to 13 chorioretinectomy-treated eyes. The chorioretinectomy group was repaired with a 20 gauge three-port pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) by removing the choroid and/or retina at the impact or perforation site of the foreign body following evacuation from a combat zone. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity and rates of globe survival, retina reattachment and proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

RESULTS

Thirty-two eyes of 31 patients with a mean age of 29 +/- 9 years (range, 19-53 years) were followed for a median of 463 +/- 226 days (range, 59-1022 days). The mean time of injury to the operating room in the chorioretinectomy group was 12.6 +/- 9.8 days, compared to that of the non-chorioretinectomy group of 22.1 +/- 16.4 days (P = 0.05) Final BCVA > or =20/200 occurred in seven of 13 (54%) of the chorioretinectomy group, compared to two of 19 (11%) in the non-chorioretinectomy group (P = 0.04). Globe survival rates were higher in the chorioretinectomy group [11 of 13 (85%) vs 9 of 19 (45%); P = 0.06], as well as the final retinal reattachment rate [8 of 13 (62%) vs 8 of 19 (42%); P = 0.47]. The proliferative vitreoretinopathy rate was eight of 13 (62%) in the chorioretinectomy group, compared to 14 of 19 (74%) in the non-chorioretinectomy group (P = 0.70). Graft failure occurred in five of six eyes (83%) of non-chorioretinectomy cases, requiring temporary keratoprosthesis and penetrating keratoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Chorioretinectomy is a surgical option that may improve final BCVA and increase globe survival rates when a foreign body penetrates the choroid or perforates the globe.

摘要

背景

报告在穿透脉络膜或刺穿眼球的情况下,行视网膜切除术与非视网膜切除术治疗眼外伤的结果。

方法

回顾性、比较、连续干预性病例系列研究,纳入 2003 年 3 月至 2009 年 3 月期间,在一家机构治疗的 32 例穿透性或严重眼内异物伤的美国军人,这些患者的眼球均遭受穿透性眼外伤。对 19 例未行视网膜切除术治疗眼的最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)与 13 例行视网膜切除术治疗眼进行比较。视网膜切除术组通过在异物穿透或穿孔部位进行 20 号三端口经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV),切除脉络膜和/或视网膜,随后从战区撤离。主要观察指标是最佳矫正视力和眼球存活率、视网膜复位率和增生性玻璃体视网膜病变(PVR)发生率。

结果

31 例患者(32 只眼)的平均年龄为 29±9 岁(19-53 岁),中位随访时间为 463±226 天(59-1022 天)。视网膜切除术组患者从受伤至进入手术室的平均时间为 12.6±9.8 天,而非视网膜切除术组为 22.1±16.4 天(P=0.05)。视网膜切除术组最终 BCVA≥20/200 的有 13 例中的 7 例(54%),而非视网膜切除术组中有 19 例中的 2 例(11%)(P=0.04)。视网膜切除术组的眼球存活率[13 例中的 11 例(85%)与 19 例中的 9 例(45%);P=0.06]和最终视网膜复位率[13 例中的 8 例(62%)与 19 例中的 8 例(42%);P=0.47]均较高。视网膜切除术组中 PVR 发生率为 13 例中的 8 例(62%),而非视网膜切除术组中为 19 例中的 14 例(74%)(P=0.70)。6 例(83%)非视网膜切除术组患者需要临时角膜移植和穿透性角膜移植,以治疗移植失败。

结论

当异物穿透脉络膜或刺穿眼球时,视网膜切除术是一种可能提高最终 BCVA 和增加眼球存活率的手术选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验