• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝伐珠单抗对转移性结直肠癌患者血清可溶性 FAS/FASL 和 TRAIL 及其受体(DR4 和 DR5)的影响。

The effect of bevacizumab on serum soluble FAS/FASL and TRAIL and its receptors (DR4 and DR5) in metastatic colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Besevler, Ankara 06500, Turkey.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct;136(10):1471-6. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0803-1. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-010-0803-1
PMID:20155284
Abstract

PURPOSE

Bevacizumab-based chemotherapy has become the standard of care in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). We aimed to measure the levels of serum soluble FAS, FASL, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), and its death receptors DR4 and DR5 in MCRC patients and to define prognostic significance of these parameters in response to bevacizumab in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The levels of these parameters in serum samples were quantified by a commercially available ELISA kit in 31 MCRC patients before and after 2 cycles of therapy and 25 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Pretreatment sFAS levels in MCRC patients was significantly lower than the levels of controls (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference in sFAS and sFASL levels in MCRC patients before and after bevacizumab-based treatment. There was no significant difference in sFAS/sFASL ratio in MCRC patients before and after treatment and controls. Soluble DR5 levels were significantly higher in pretreatment serum samples compared with controls (p = 0.008). However, pretreatment sTRAIL and sDR4 levels were similar to the levels of controls. There was no significant difference in sTRAIL, sDR4, and sDR5 levels in MCRC patients before and after treatment. When patients were grouped according to treatment response (responders vs. non-responders), post-treatment sFAS/sFASL ratio was significantly lower in responding patients compared with non-responders (p = 0.029). Significant correlations were observed between post-treatment sFASL and sDR4, sFAS and sTRAIL, sTRAIL and sFAS/sFASL ratio, and sFASL and sDR5.

CONCLUSION

Non-significant changes in apoptotic markers with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy showed that they have no prognostic significance in MCRC patients. Significant change in sFAS/sFASL ratio according to treatment response could be an indicator of chemosensitivity.

摘要

目的

贝伐珠单抗为基础的化疗已成为转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)的标准治疗方法。我们旨在测量 MCRC 患者血清可溶性 FAS、FASL、肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)及其死亡受体 DR4 和 DR5 的水平,并确定这些参数在这些患者对贝伐珠单抗治疗反应中的预后意义。

方法

在 31 例 MCRC 患者接受 2 个周期的治疗前后及 25 例健康对照者中,采用商业上可获得的 ELISA 试剂盒定量检测这些参数在血清样本中的水平。

结果

MCRC 患者治疗前 sFAS 水平明显低于对照组(p = 0.043)。MCRC 患者在接受贝伐珠单抗治疗前后 sFAS 和 sFASL 水平无显著差异。治疗前后 MCRC 患者与对照组的 sFAS/sFASL 比值无显著差异。预处理血清样本中可溶性 DR5 水平明显高于对照组(p = 0.008)。然而,预处理 sTRAIL 和 sDR4 水平与对照组相似。治疗前后 MCRC 患者 sTRAIL、sDR4 和 sDR5 水平无显著差异。根据治疗反应(应答者与非应答者)将患者分组后,与非应答者相比,应答者治疗后 sFAS/sFASL 比值明显降低(p = 0.029)。治疗后 sFASL 与 sDR4、sFAS 与 sTRAIL、sTRAIL 与 sFAS/sFASL 比值、sFASL 与 sDR5 之间均存在显著相关性。

结论

贝伐珠单抗为基础的化疗后凋亡标志物无明显变化表明其对 MCRC 患者无预后意义。根据治疗反应的 sFAS/sFASL 比值的显著变化可能是化疗敏感性的指标。

相似文献

1
The effect of bevacizumab on serum soluble FAS/FASL and TRAIL and its receptors (DR4 and DR5) in metastatic colorectal cancer.贝伐珠单抗对转移性结直肠癌患者血清可溶性 FAS/FASL 和 TRAIL 及其受体(DR4 和 DR5)的影响。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct;136(10):1471-6. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0803-1. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
2
Analysis of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and Fas/FasL in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer associated with HLA-A2.对 HLA-A2 相关的日本非小细胞肺癌患者的细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞及 Fas/FasL 的分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2002 Nov;128(11):581-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-002-0381-y. Epub 2002 Oct 25.
3
Real-world comparison of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without immunotherapy as first-line therapy in colorectal cancer.化疗联合贝伐单抗加或不加免疫疗法作为结直肠癌一线治疗的真实世界比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 28;31(24):108298. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i24.108298.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.西妥昔单抗(单药或联合化疗)、贝伐珠单抗(联合非奥沙利铂化疗)和帕尼单抗(单药治疗)用于一线化疗后转移性结直肠癌治疗的临床疗效和成本效果评价(技术评估 150 号报告的部分回顾和技术评估 118 号报告的综述):系统评价和经济模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(14):1-237. doi: 10.3310/hta17140.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Expression of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its receptors in gastric carcinoma and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes: a possible mechanism of immune evasion of the tumor.肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)及其受体在胃癌和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞中的表达:肿瘤免疫逃逸的一种可能机制。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb;128(2):73-9. doi: 10.1007/s004320100292. Epub 2001 Dec 12.
7
Increased serum sFas, sTRAIL, and reduced sFasL in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.幼年特发性关节炎患者血清可溶性 Fas(sFas)、可溶性 TRAIL(sTRAIL)升高,可溶性 FasL(sFasL)降低。
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Dec;36(12):2847-2852. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3615-8. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.贝伐单抗和西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(12):1-128, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11120.
9
Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without anti-programmed death 1 immunotherapy as the second-line therapy in colorectal cancer.化疗联合贝伐单抗,联合或不联合抗程序性死亡1免疫疗法作为结直肠癌的二线治疗方案。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 7;31(21):106939. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i21.106939.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
TRAIL C1595T Variant Critically Alters the Level of sTRAIL in Terms of Histopathological Parameters in Colorectal Cancer.TRAIL基因C1595T变异在结直肠癌组织病理学参数方面显著改变可溶性TRAIL水平。
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2024 Oct;39(4):593-599. doi: 10.1007/s12291-023-01146-z. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
The Construction and Analysis of ceRNA Network and Patterns of Immune Infiltration in Colon Adenocarcinoma Metastasis.结肠癌转移中ceRNA网络的构建与分析及免疫浸润模式
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Aug 4;8:688. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00688. eCollection 2020.
3
Associations of serum soluble Fas and Fas ligand (FasL) with outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic significance of TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R3 expression in metastatic colorectal carcinomas.TRAIL-R1和TRAIL-R3表达在转移性结直肠癌中的预后意义
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Oct;44(15):2312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.042. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
2
Cancer statistics, 2008.2008年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71-96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
3
Prognostic significance of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and its receptors in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients.
血清可溶性 Fas 和 Fas 配体 (FasL) 与系统性红斑狼疮结局的相关性。
Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Jun;7(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000375.
4
Fas Versatile Signaling and Beyond: Pivotal Role of Tyrosine Phosphorylation in Context-Dependent Signaling and Diseases.Fas的多功能信号传导及其他:酪氨酸磷酸化在依赖于背景的信号传导和疾病中的关键作用
Front Immunol. 2016 Oct 17;7:429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00429. eCollection 2016.
5
Clinical significance of serum soluble death receptor 5 concentration in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者血清可溶性死亡受体5浓度的临床意义
Oncol Lett. 2014 Sep;8(3):1333-1339. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2237. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
6
Increased serum sTRAIL levels were correlated with survival in bevacizumab-treated metastatic colon cancer.血清 sTRAIL 水平升高与贝伐珠单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的生存相关。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Feb 7;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-58.
肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体及其受体在辅助治疗的III期结肠癌患者中的预后意义
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 1;24(31):4998-5004. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8809.
4
Tumour necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces hepatic steatosis in viral hepatitis and after alcohol intake.肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)在病毒性肝炎及摄入酒精后可诱发肝脂肪变性。
Gut. 2005 Nov;54(11):1590-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.056929.
5
Evaluating the expression and prognostic value of TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 in breast cancer.评估TRAIL-R1和TRAIL-R2在乳腺癌中的表达及预后价值。
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jul 15;11(14):5188-94. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0158.
6
FAS/FAS ligand ratio: a marker of oxaliplatin-based intrinsic and acquired resistance in advanced colorectal cancer.FAS/FAS配体比值:晚期结直肠癌中基于奥沙利铂的内在性和获得性耐药的标志物。
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jul 1;11(13):4770-4. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2119.
7
Increase in autoantibodies against Fas (CD95) during carcinogenesis in the human colon: a hope for the immunoprevention of cancer?人类结肠癌发生过程中抗Fas(CD95)自身抗体的增加:癌症免疫预防的希望?
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005 Oct;54(10):1038-42. doi: 10.1007/s00262-005-0679-0. Epub 2005 Apr 28.
8
Prognostic significance of serum soluble Fas level and its change during regression and progression of advanced prostate cancer.
Endocr J. 2003 Oct;50(5):629-33. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.50.629.
9
Expression of TRAIL and TRAIL death receptors in stage III non-small cell lung cancer tumors.TRAIL及TRAIL死亡受体在III期非小细胞肺癌肿瘤中的表达
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Aug 15;9(9):3397-405.
10
Expression of TRAIL and TRAIL receptors in colon carcinoma: TRAIL-R1 is an independent prognostic parameter.肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)及其受体在结肠癌中的表达:TRAIL-R1是一个独立的预后参数。
Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Dec;8(12):3734-40.