Suppr超能文献

化疗联合贝伐单抗,联合或不联合抗程序性死亡1免疫疗法作为结直肠癌的二线治疗方案。

Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without anti-programmed death 1 immunotherapy as the second-line therapy in colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Gao Zhao, Wang Xiao-Yan, Shen Zhi-Gang, Liu Jia-Hua, Wang Xiao-Yun, Wu Shi-Kai, Jin Xuan

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun 130012, Jilin Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 7;31(21):106939. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i21.106939.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically exhibit an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and demonstrate a low response rate to immunotherapy. Reports suggest that chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy may have the potential to enhance the response to immunotherapy in these patients. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab with or without anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy as the second-line regimen for MSS mCRC.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab with or without anti-PD-1 immunotherapy as the second-line regimen for MSS mCRC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with MSS mCRC diagnosed at Peking University First Hospital and Jilin Cancer Hospital from January 2020 to December 2024. The patients were divided into two groups: The experimental group receiving second-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, and the control group receiving chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Propensity score matching was applied to balance potential prognostic factors, including age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, number of metastases, and primary tumor site. The progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare survival outcomes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching resulted in 103 matched eligible patients. The median follow-up period was 13.9 months in the matched cohort. The objective response rate was 11.5% and 9% for the experimental and control groups, respectively ( = 0.710), while the disease control rate was 76.9% and 53.2%, respectively ( = 0.058). The median progression-free survival in the experimental group was 8.27 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7-14.7 months], significantly higher than that in the control group, which was 4.63 months (95%CI: 3.9-5.67 months) (hazard ratio = 0.4143, 95%CI: 0.2462-0.6972, = 0.00066). There was a trend towards the higher median overall survival in the experimental group compared to the control group (hazard ratio = 0.4504, 95%CI: 0.1897-1.07, = 0.064). The incidences of adverse events were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the standard second-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab regimen, second-line therapy that combines chemotherapy with bevacizumab and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy has demonstrated promising efficacy in the treatment of MSS mCRC, while exhibiting a similar safety profile.

摘要

背景

微卫星稳定(MSS)的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者通常表现出免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境,对免疫治疗的反应率较低。报告表明,化疗和抗血管生成治疗可能有增强这些患者对免疫治疗反应的潜力。本研究旨在评估化疗联合贝伐单抗加或不加抗程序性死亡1(PD-1)免疫治疗作为MSS mCRC二线治疗方案的有效性和安全性。

目的

评估化疗联合贝伐单抗加或不加抗PD-1免疫治疗作为MSS mCRC二线治疗方案的有效性和安全性。

方法

对2020年1月至2024年12月在北京大学第一医院和吉林省肿瘤医院确诊的MSS mCRC患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为两组:实验组接受二线化疗联合贝伐单抗和抗PD-1免疫治疗,对照组接受化疗联合贝伐单抗。应用倾向评分匹配以平衡潜在的预后因素,包括年龄、性别、东部肿瘤协作组评分、转移灶数量和原发肿瘤部位。比较两组的无进展生存期、总生存期、疾病控制率、客观缓解率和治疗相关不良反应。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验比较生存结果。使用治疗权重的逆概率进行敏感性分析。

结果

倾向评分匹配产生了103例匹配的合格患者。匹配队列中的中位随访期为13.9个月。实验组和对照组的客观缓解率分别为11.5%和9%(P = 0.710),而疾病控制率分别为76.9%和53.2%(P = 0.058)。实验组的中位无进展生存期为8.27个月[95%置信区间(CI):6.7 - 14.7个月],显著高于对照组的4.63个月(95%CI:3.9 - 5.67个月)(风险比 = 0.4143,95%CI:0.2462 - 0.6972,P = 0.00066)。与对照组相比,实验组的中位总生存期有升高趋势(风险比 = 0.4504,95%CI:0.1897 - 1.07,P = 0.064)。两组不良事件的发生率相似。

结论

与标准的二线化疗联合贝伐单抗方案相比,化疗联合贝伐单抗和抗PD-1免疫治疗的二线治疗方案在治疗MSS mCRC方面显示出有前景的疗效,同时安全性相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1795/12175866/0fc8c1470f58/wjg-31-21-106939-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验