DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., R&D, Human Nutrition and Health, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.
Nutr Cancer. 2009;61(6):767-74. doi: 10.1080/01635580903285155.
A number of epidemiological studies have reported associations of beta-carotene plasma levels or intake with decreased lung cancer risk. However, intervention studies in smokers have unexpectedly reported increased lung tumor rates after high, long-term, beta-carotene supplementation. Recently, detailed analyses by stratification for smoking habits of several large, long-term intervention or epidemiological trials are now available. The ATBC study, the CARET study, the Antioxidant Polyp Prevention trial, and the E3N study provide evidence that the adverse effects of beta-carotene supplementation are correlated with the smoking status of the study participants. In contrast, the Physician Health Study, the Linxian trial, and a pooled analysis of 7 epidemiological cohort studies have not supported this evidence. The ferret and A/J mouse lung cancer model have been used to investigate the mechanism of interaction of beta-carotene with carcinogens in the lung. Both models have specific advantages and disadvantages. There are a number of hypotheses concerning the beta-carotene/tobacco smoke interaction including alterations of retinoid metabolism and signaling pathways and interaction with CYP enzymes and pro-oxidation/DNA oxidation. The animal models consistently demonstrate negative effects only in the ferret, and following dosing with beta-carotene in corn oil at pharmacological dosages. No effects or even protective effects against smoke or carcinogen exposure were observed when beta-carotene was applied at physiological dosages or in combination with vitamins C and E, either as a mixture or in a stable formulation. In conclusion, human and animal studies have shown that specific circumstances, among them heavy smoking, seem to influence the effect of high beta-carotene intakes. In normal, healthy, nonsmoking populations, there is evidence of beneficial effects.
一些流行病学研究报告了β-胡萝卜素血浆水平或摄入量与肺癌风险降低之间的关联。然而,对吸烟者进行的干预研究出人意料地报告称,高剂量、长期补充β-胡萝卜素后肺癌肿瘤发生率增加。最近,对几项大型、长期干预或流行病学试验的吸烟习惯进行分层的详细分析现已可用。ATBC 研究、CARET 研究、抗氧化剂多聚预防试验和 E3N 研究提供的证据表明,β-胡萝卜素补充的不良影响与研究参与者的吸烟状况相关。相比之下,医师健康研究、林县试验以及对 7 项流行病学队列研究的汇总分析并未支持这一证据。雪貂和 A/J 小鼠肺癌模型已被用于研究β-胡萝卜素与肺癌致癌物相互作用的机制。这两种模型各有优缺点。关于β-胡萝卜素与烟草烟雾相互作用的机制有许多假说,包括视黄醇代谢和信号通路的改变以及与 CYP 酶的相互作用和促氧化/DNA 氧化。动物模型一致表明,只有在雪貂中,并且在以药理学剂量用玉米油给予β-胡萝卜素后,才会产生负面影响。当以生理剂量或以混合物或以稳定配方与维生素 C 和 E 联合应用β-胡萝卜素时,无论是在吸烟或致癌物暴露时,都没有观察到效果甚至保护作用。总之,人体和动物研究表明,特定情况,包括大量吸烟,似乎会影响高β-胡萝卜素摄入量的效果。在正常、健康、不吸烟的人群中,有证据表明有益的效果。