Department of Internal Medicine, San Giuseppe Hospital, Albano Laziale, Rome - Italy.
J Nephrol. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):306-13.
Patients older than 85 years are increasingly admitted to hospital care settings. Despite this, the clinical employment of equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been scarcely investigated so far in this age group. Our study compared 2 commonly employed equations to estimate GFR, as well as measured 24-hour creatinine clearance (CrCl), in patients aged >or=85 years.
Seventy-three patients consecutively admitted over 4 months to our Internal Medicine Department had an accurate 24-hour urinary collection, as well as serum and urinary creatinine determinations. Measured CrCl was compared with the GFR values estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study and Mayo Clinic quadratic (MCQ) equations.
GFR values derived by MDRD and MCQ equations and CrCl significantly differed from each other in the whole sample. CrCl negatively correlated with age (r=-0.389, p<0.001), at variance with GFR levels obtained by both the MDRD and the MCQ equations. The 3 estimates of renal function significantly correlated with each other, these correlations persisting after correcting for age, serum albumin and 24-hour urinary creatinine. Despite the visual impression of Bland and Altman plots, the overall agreement between methods was poor. Moreover, the proportion of patients classified by the 3 GFR estimates into each stage of kidney disease as specified in the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines significantly differed.
In patients older than 85 years, the tested equations for estimation of GFR and the measured 24-hour CrCl provide significantly different results, so that they may not be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
85 岁以上的患者越来越多地被收治到医院护理环境中。尽管如此,到目前为止,在这个年龄组中,对于估计肾小球滤过率(GFR)的方程的临床应用还很少被研究。我们的研究比较了 2 种常用于估计 GFR 的方程,以及测量了 73 例年龄> = 85 岁的患者的 24 小时肌酐清除率(CrCl)。
在 4 个月的时间里,我们内科连续收治了 73 例患者,他们进行了准确的 24 小时尿液收集,以及血清和尿液肌酐测定。测量的 CrCl 与由肾脏病饮食改良试验(MDRD)研究和 Mayo 诊所二次方(MCQ)方程估计的 GFR 值进行了比较。
MDRD 和 MCQ 方程得出的 GFR 值与整个样本中的 CrCl 值显著不同。CrCl 与年龄呈负相关(r=-0.389,p<0.001),而与 MDRD 和 MCQ 方程得出的 GFR 值不同。这 3 种肾功能估计值彼此之间存在显著相关性,这些相关性在纠正年龄、血清白蛋白和 24 小时尿液肌酐后仍然存在。尽管 Bland 和 Altman 图的直观印象表明,这些方法之间的总体一致性较差,但仍然存在。此外,3 种 GFR 估计值将患者分类为肾脏病结果质量倡议(K/DOQI)指南规定的每个疾病阶段的比例显著不同。
在 85 岁以上的患者中,用于估计 GFR 的测试方程和测量的 24 小时 CrCl 提供了显著不同的结果,因此在临床实践中不能互换使用。