Department of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
Hear Res. 2010 May;263(1-2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
The extension of indication of implantable hearing aids to cases of conductive hearing loss pushed the development of these devices. There is now a great variety of devices available with different actuator concepts and different attachment points to the middle ear or inner ear fluid. But there is little comparative data available about the devices to provide an insight into advantages and disadvantages of different types of actuators and attachment points at the ossicular chain. This paper investigates two principle (idealized) types of actuators in respect of attachments points at the ossicular chain and direction of excitation. Other parts of implantable hearing aids like microphone, amplifier and signal processing electronics were not incorporated into this study. Investigations were performed by means of a mathematical simulation model of the middle ear (finite element model). Actuator performance and theoretical gain were calculated by harmonic analysis in the frequency range of 100-6000 Hz and were compared for the different situations. The stapes head proofed to be an ideal attachment point for actuators of both types as this position is very insensitive to changes in the direction of excitation. The implantable actuators showed higher ratio of equivalent sound pressure to radiated sound pressure compared to an open hearing aid transducer and should therefore allow for more functional gain.
可植入助听设备适应证的扩展已推动了这类设备的发展。目前,市场上有各种各样的设备,它们具有不同的驱动概念和不同的中耳或内耳液附着点。但是,关于这些设备的比较数据很少,难以深入了解不同类型的驱动器和附着点在听骨链上的优缺点。本文针对附着在听骨链上的驱动器和激励方向这两个主要(理想化)类型,对两种原理(理想化)类型的驱动器进行了研究。本文没有将植入式助听设备的其他部分(如麦克风、放大器和信号处理电子设备)纳入研究范围。采用中耳的数学模拟模型(有限元模型)进行了研究。在 100-6000Hz 的频率范围内通过谐波分析计算了驱动器的性能和理论增益,并对不同情况下的增益进行了比较。对于这两种类型的驱动器,镫骨头部被证明是理想的附着点,因为这个位置对激励方向的变化非常不敏感。与开放式助听换能器相比,植入式驱动器的等效声压与辐射声压的比值更高,因此应该可以提供更多的功能增益。