• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟内的患者流动性:推动欧盟内部医疗市场发展

Patient mobility in the European Union: pushing for EU internal health market.

作者信息

Lang Iris Goldner

机构信息

Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Med Law. 2009 Dec;28(4):661-71.

PMID:20157977
Abstract

Having access to high-quality healthcare is a priority issue for European citizens and is recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. The right to healthcare also encompasses situations where patients travel from one EU Member State to another and receive treatment there. This paper will explore the contradictory relation between the competence of EU Member States to regulate their health systems on their own, on the one hand, and free movement of services in the European Union, on the other hand. It will discuss the consequences of the decisions of the European Court of Justice in this field and the provisions of the Proposal for a Directive on Patients' Rights in Cross-Border Healthcare, especially in the light of opening up of EU Member States' healthcare markets, the need to control national healthcare expenditures and to protect the welfare state and the population of the host state.

摘要

获得高质量的医疗保健是欧洲公民的首要问题,并且得到了欧盟《基本权利宪章》的认可。医疗保健权还包括患者从一个欧盟成员国前往另一个成员国并在那里接受治疗的情况。本文将探讨一方面欧盟成员国自行监管其卫生系统的权限,与另一方面欧盟服务自由流动之间的矛盾关系。它将讨论欧洲法院在这一领域的裁决的后果以及《跨境医疗保健患者权利指令提案》的规定,特别是鉴于欧盟成员国医疗保健市场的开放、控制国家医疗保健支出的必要性以及保护福利国家和东道国人口的需要。

相似文献

1
Patient mobility in the European Union: pushing for EU internal health market.欧盟内的患者流动性:推动欧盟内部医疗市场发展
Med Law. 2009 Dec;28(4):661-71.
2
Free movement of patients: Directive 2011/24 on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare.患者的自由流动:关于跨境医疗保健中患者权利适用的第2011/24号指令。
Eur J Health Law. 2012 Mar;19(1):29-60. doi: 10.1163/157180912x615158.
3
Treatments of low-priority and the Patient Mobility Directive 2011, an end to legal uncertainty for the English NHS?低优先级治疗与《2011年患者流动指令》,英国国民医疗服务体系法律不确定性的终结?
Eur J Health Law. 2013 Jun;20(3):295-314. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341281.
4
Implications of the EU patients' rights directive in cross-border healthcare on the German sickness fund system.欧盟患者跨境医疗保健权利指令对德国疾病保险基金体系的影响。
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 2014;12:49-66. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-5480-6_3.
5
Avoiding another directive: the unstable politics of European Union cross-border health care law.避免另一个指令:欧盟跨境医疗保健法的不稳定政治。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Oct;8(4):415-21. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000424. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
Eu Cross-border Healthcare and Health Law.欧盟跨境医疗保健与卫生法
Eur J Health Law. 2015 Mar;22(1):1-12. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341348.
7
The transposition of the Directive on Patients' Rights in Cross-care Healthcare in national law by the Member States: still a lot of effort to be made and questions to be answered.成员国将《跨境医疗保健患者权利指令》转化为国内法的情况:仍有大量工作要做,诸多问题有待解答。
Eur J Health Law. 2014 Mar;21(1):1-14. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341307.
8
Implementation of the Directive 2011/24/EU in the Czech Republic.2011/24/EU号指令在捷克共和国的实施情况。
Eur J Health Law. 2014 Mar;21(1):15-22. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341303.
9
The implementation of the Directive on the Application of Patients' Rights in Cross-border Healthcare in the Netherlands.荷兰《跨境医疗保健患者权利指令》的实施情况。
Eur J Health Law. 2014 Mar;21(1):65-78. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341308.
10
Cross-border healthcare directive: Assessing stakeholders' perspectives in Poland and Portugal.跨境医疗保健指令:评估波兰和葡萄牙利益相关者的观点。
Health Policy. 2016 Apr;120(4):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting violations of European Charter of Patients' Rights: analysis of patient complaints in Croatia.报告违反欧洲患者权利宪章的行为:克罗地亚患者投诉分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 8;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00714-3.