University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Feb;91(2):184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.020.
To determine whether comorbid mental disorders affect inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) costs and to examine the extent to which Medicare's prospective payment system reimbursement sufficiently covers those costs.
Secondary analysis of Medicare IRF Patient Assessment Instrument files and Medicare Provider and Review files. Payment was compared with costs for patients with and without reported mood, major depression, substance use, or anxiety disorders. The relationships among payment group assignment, comorbidity-related adjustments in payment, and the presence of mental disorders were estimated.
IRFs (N=1334) in the United States.
Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (N=1,146,799) discharged from IRFs from 2002 to 2004.
Not applicable.
IRF costs.
Mental disorders were reported for 13% of the Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. After controlling for payment group and comorbidity classifications, patients with mood, major depression, or anxiety disorders had significantly greater costs of $433, $1642, and $247 compared with patients without these disorders. The higher cost for patients with major depression (14.9% higher) is sufficient to justify a tier 2 comorbidity classification.
A reimbursement adjustment for the presence of a major depressive disorder would bring Medicare reimbursement in line with facility costs. The failure to compensate facilities directly for providing care to patients with major depression may result in reduced access to care for these patients. It also may create a disincentive to meet mental health treatment needs during the rehabilitative episode. Further work is needed to compare costs between patients with and without confirmed mental health disorders, given concerns about the accurate reporting of mental health disorders.
确定合并精神障碍是否会影响住院康复设施 (IRF) 的成本,并研究医疗保险的前瞻性支付系统补偿是否足以覆盖这些成本。
对医疗保险 IRF 患者评估工具文件和医疗保险提供者和审查文件进行二次分析。比较了报告有情绪、重度抑郁症、物质使用或焦虑障碍的患者与没有报告这些障碍的患者的支付情况。估计了支付组分配、与合并症相关的支付调整以及精神障碍存在之间的关系。
美国的 IRF(N=1334)。
医疗保险收费服务受益人的(N=1,146,799)从 2002 年至 2004 年从 IRF 出院。
不适用。
IRF 成本。
13%的医疗保险收费服务受益人报告有精神障碍。在控制支付组和合并症分类后,有情绪、重度抑郁症或焦虑障碍的患者的成本显著增加了 433 美元、1642 美元和 247 美元,而没有这些障碍的患者则没有增加。重度抑郁症患者的成本增加(增加 14.9%)足以证明二级合并症分类是合理的。
为重度抑郁症的存在提供报销调整将使医疗保险的报销与设施成本保持一致。未能直接向为患有重度抑郁症的患者提供护理的设施提供补偿,可能会导致这些患者获得护理的机会减少。这也可能会在康复期间产生对满足精神健康治疗需求的抑制作用。鉴于对精神健康障碍准确报告的担忧,需要进一步比较有和没有确诊精神健康障碍的患者之间的成本。