• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗执照管理局特征与医师纪律:一项实证分析。

Medical licensing board characteristics and physician discipline: an empirical analysis.

机构信息

University of Vermont, USA.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010 Feb;35(1):63-93. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2009-041.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-2009-041
PMID:20159847
Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between the characteristics of medical licensing boards and the frequency with which boards discipline physicians. Specifically, we take advantage of variation in the structure of medical licensing boards between 1993 and 2003 to determine the effect of organizational and budgetary independence, public oversight, and resource constraints on rates of physician discipline. We find that larger licensing boards, boards with more staff, and boards that are organizationally independent from state government discipline doctors more frequently. Public oversight and political control over board budgets do not appear to influence the extent to which medical licensing boards discipline doctors. These findings are broadly consistent with theories of regulatory behavior that emphasize the importance of bureaucratic autonomy for effective regulatory enforcement.

摘要

本文研究了医疗执照管理机构的特点与该机构对医生进行纪律处分的频率之间的关系。具体而言,我们利用 1993 年至 2003 年期间医疗执照管理机构结构的变化,来确定组织和预算独立性、公众监督以及资源限制对医生纪律处分率的影响。我们发现,规模较大、人员较多且在组织上独立于州政府的执照管理机构更频繁地对医生进行纪律处分。公众监督和对执照管理机构预算的政治控制似乎并未影响医疗执照管理机构对医生进行纪律处分的程度。这些发现与强调官僚自治对有效监管执行重要性的监管行为理论基本一致。

相似文献

1
Medical licensing board characteristics and physician discipline: an empirical analysis.医疗执照管理局特征与医师纪律:一项实证分析。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010 Feb;35(1):63-93. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2009-041.
2
Directing Discipline: State Medical Board Responsiveness to State Legislatures.指导纪律:州医学委员会对州立法机构的回应
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Feb;42(1):123-165. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3702794. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
Sanctions and recidivism: an evaluation of physician discipline by state medical boards.制裁与累犯:州医学委员会对医生纪律处分的评估
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Oct;32(5):867-85. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-033.
4
Access to enforcement and disciplinary data: information practices of state health professional regulatory boards of dentistry, medicine and nursing.获取执法和纪律处分数据:牙科、医学和护理领域州卫生专业监管委员会的信息实践
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2011 Spring;33(4):534-70.
5
Report on a flawed "report card": the public citizens ranking of medical licensing boards.关于一份有缺陷的“成绩单”的报告:公众对医疗执照委员会的排名
WMJ. 2005 Feb;104(2):11-6.
6
State medical boards. Future challenges for regulation and quality enhancement of medical care.州医学委员会。医疗监管与质量提升的未来挑战。
J Leg Med. 2012 Jan;33(1):93-114. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2012.657601.
7
Will state licensing boards become managed care's police?州许可委员会会成为管理式医疗的监管机构吗?
Manag Care. 1995 Oct;4(10):45-6, 49.
8
Protecting the public: state medical board licensure policies for active and inactive physicians.保护公众:针对在职和非在职医生的州医学委员会执照政策
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):643-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1017.
9
Increasing the value of the state medical license.提高国家医疗执照的价值。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1459-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0912754.
10
Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school.医学委员会的纪律处分及医学院期间的过往行为。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2673-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa052596.

引用本文的文献

1
Licensure Actions Against Psychiatric Clinicians: A Cohort Analysis of National Practitioner Database Reports.针对精神科临床医生的执业许可行动:对国家从业者数据库报告的队列分析
J Psychiatr Pract. 2025 Jan 1;31(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000831.
2
State Medical Boards, Licensure, and Discipline in the United States.美国的州医学委员会、执照颁发与纪律处分
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2019 Oct;17(4):337-342. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190020. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Opioid Prescribing and Physician Autonomy: A Quality of Care Perspective.
阿片类药物处方与医生自主权:基于医疗质量的视角
HSS J. 2019 Feb;15(1):20-26. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-09666-8. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Outcomes of notifications to health practitioner boards: a retrospective cohort study.向健康从业者委员会通报的结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2016 Dec 2;14(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0748-6.