Logan Trevon D
The Ohio State University, 410 Arps Hall, 1945 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43210, and NBER.
Explor Econ Hist. 2009 Apr 1;46(2):169-185. doi: 10.1016/j.eeh.2008.06.003.
Using both IPUMS and the Colored Troops Sample of the Civil War Union Army Data, I estimate the effects of literacy and health on the migration propensities of African Americans from 1870 to 1910. I find that literacy and health shocks were strong predictors of migration and the stock of health was not. There were differential selection propensities based on slave status-former slaves were less likely to migrate given a specific health shock than free blacks. Counterfactuals suggest that as much as 35 percent of the difference in the mobility patterns of former slaves and free blacks is explained by differences in their human capital, and more than 20 percent of that difference is due to health alone. Overall, the selection effect of literacy on migration is reduced by one-tenth to one-third once health is controlled for. The low levels of human capital accumulation and rates of mobility for African Americans after the Civil War are partly explained by the poor health status of slaves and their immediate descendants.
利用综合公共使用微数据系列(IPUMS)以及美国内战联邦军队数据中的有色人种部队样本,我估算了1870年至1910年识字率和健康状况对非裔美国人移民倾向的影响。我发现识字率和健康冲击是移民的有力预测因素,而健康存量则不是。基于奴隶身份存在不同的选择倾向——在特定健康冲击下,前奴隶比自由黑人迁移的可能性更小。反事实分析表明,前奴隶和自由黑人流动模式差异中多达35%可由他们人力资本的差异来解释,其中超过20%的差异仅归因于健康状况。总体而言,一旦控制了健康因素,识字率对移民的选择效应会降低十分之一到三分之一。内战后非裔美国人人力资本积累水平低和流动率低,部分原因在于奴隶及其直系后代健康状况不佳。