Suppr超能文献

黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的自然选择:对选择价值的感知和时间效应

Natural Choice in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Perceptual and Temporal Effects on Selective Value.

作者信息

Beran Michael J, Ratliff Chasity L, Evans Theodore A

机构信息

Language Research Center, Georgia State University.

出版信息

Learn Motiv. 2009 May 1;40(2):186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.11.002.

Abstract

In three experiments, four chimpanzees made choices between two visible food options to assess the validity of the selective value effect (the assignment of value to only the most preferred type of food presented in a comparison). In Experiment 1, we established that all chimpanzees preferred single banana pieces to single apple pieces before presenting the critical test. In this test two chimpanzees preferred a mix of one banana piece and one apple piece to a single banana piece when both banana piece were approximately the same size, but two chimpanzees were indifferent between the two options, exhibiting the selective value effect. In Experiment 2, when the banana pieces in both options were more closely equated in size the chimpanzees then were biased to choose the single banana piece over the mixed array even though this was the smaller total amount of food. However, in Experiment 3, when we introduced longer intervals between each trial, the chimpanzees preferred the mixed set and thus the larger total amount of food. The results demonstrate that only some chimpanzees exhibit the choice pattern indicative of the selective value effect, and they do so only when item size is not carefully controlled and trials are presented quickly in succession. Thus, the behavior pattern originally labeled the selective value effect may actually be explained by a combination of chimpanzees' sensitivity to small differences in preferred food amount and chimpanzees tendency to avoid less preferred foods that would delay the acquisition of further preferred food items.

摘要

在三项实验中,四只黑猩猩在两种可见食物选项之间做出选择,以评估选择性价值效应(仅对比较中呈现的最偏好食物类型赋予价值)的有效性。在实验1中,在进行关键测试之前,我们确定所有黑猩猩都更喜欢单块香蕉而不是单块苹果。在这项测试中,当两块香蕉大小大致相同时,两只黑猩猩更喜欢一块香蕉和一块苹果的组合,而不是单块香蕉,但有两只黑猩猩对这两种选择无差异,表现出选择性价值效应。在实验2中,当两种选项中的香蕉块大小更接近相等时,黑猩猩则倾向于选择单块香蕉而不是混合组合,尽管这是食物总量较少的选择。然而,在实验3中,当我们在每次试验之间引入更长的间隔时,黑猩猩更喜欢混合组合,从而选择了总量更大的食物。结果表明,只有一些黑猩猩表现出表明选择性价值效应的选择模式,而且只有在物品大小没有得到仔细控制且试验相继快速呈现时才会如此。因此,最初被称为选择性价值效应的行为模式实际上可能是由黑猩猩对偏好食物量微小差异的敏感性以及黑猩猩倾向于避免不太偏好的食物(因为这会延迟获取更多偏好食物)这两种因素共同解释的。

相似文献

1
Natural Choice in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Perceptual and Temporal Effects on Selective Value.
Learn Motiv. 2009 May 1;40(2):186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.11.002.
2
Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the role of magnitude, contiguity, and wholeness.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Oct;35(4):516-24. doi: 10.1037/a0015488.
3
Defining value through quantity and quality-Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) undervalue food quantities when items are broken.
Behav Processes. 2015 Feb;111:118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
7
Computerized intertemporal choice task in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) with/without postreward delay.
J Comp Psychol. 2021 May;135(2):185-195. doi: 10.1037/com0000254. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Chimpanzees' socially maintained food preferences indicate both conservatism and conformity.
Anim Behav. 2011 Jun 1;81(6):1195-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.002.
9
Touch-screen-guided task reveals a prosocial choice tendency by chimpanzees ().
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 31;6:e5315. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5315. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

2
Quantity-quality trade-off in the acquisition of token preference by capuchin monkeys ( spp.).
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190662. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0662. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
3
Chimpanzees Predict the Hedonic Outcome of Novel Taste Combinations: The Evolutionary Origins of Affective Forecasting.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 6;11:549193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549193. eCollection 2020.
4
Experimentally revealed stochastic preferences for multicomponent choice options.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Oct;46(4):367-384. doi: 10.1037/xan0000269. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
More evidence that less is better: Sub-optimal choice in dogs.
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):462-471. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0326-1.
6
Dealing with interference: Chimpanzees respond to conflicting cues in a food-choice memory task.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(4):366-376. doi: 10.1037/xan0000151.
8
Defining value through quantity and quality-Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) undervalue food quantities when items are broken.
Behav Processes. 2015 Feb;111:118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
9
Gambling primates: reactions to a modified Iowa Gambling Task in humans, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys.
Anim Cogn. 2014 Jul;17(4):983-95. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0730-7. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
10
Chimpanzees sometimes see fuller as better: judgments of food quantities based on container size and fullness.
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.12.011. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis.
Am J Primatol. 1989;19(4):203-216. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350190403.
2
Perception of Food Amounts by Chimpanzees Based on the Number, Size, Contour Length and Visibility of Items.
Anim Behav. 2008 May;75(5):1793-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.035.
3
Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game.
Science. 2007 Oct 5;318(5847):107-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1145850.
4
Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):275-82. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0111-6. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
5
Selection of Food by Size in the Chimpanzee, and Comparison with Human Judgments.
Science. 1960 May 20;131(3412):1527-8. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3412.1527.
7
What wild primates know about resources: opening up the black box.
Anim Cogn. 2007 Jul;10(3):357-67. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0080-9.
9
Free-ranging rhesus monkeys spontaneously individuate and enumerate small numbers of non-solid portions.
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):207-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
10
Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris).
Anim Cogn. 2007 Jan;10(1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0042-7. Epub 2006 Aug 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验