Elvin-Lewis Memory
Washington University, St. Louis 63130, USA.
Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2007 Jun 10;4(4):443-68.
In the context of evolving intellectual property law, defining ownership of traditional knowledge can be challenging when claims of origin are conflicting and requires accepting parameters of how uniqueness is defined and patent law is applied to protect this information. For purposes of this paper, the complexities of evolving benefit sharing for custodians of traditional knowledge are discussed in relationship to the use of medicinal plants. Parameters of ownership can vary not only by the perception of individuals that lay claim to the information but also by international, regional and national laws that govern how benefits should be fairly appropriated. Examples are provided to exemplify the wide variation that presently exists in this evolving process with illustrations of how this information, novel or otherwise, can be utilized to optimize its commercial worth.
在不断发展的知识产权法背景下,当来源主张相互冲突时,界定传统知识的所有权可能具有挑战性,这需要接受如何定义独特性以及如何应用专利法来保护此类信息的参数。就本文而言,将结合药用植物的使用来讨论传统知识保管人不断演变的利益分享的复杂性。所有权参数不仅可能因对该信息提出主张的个人认知而有所不同,还可能因管辖利益应如何公平分配的国际、区域和国家法律而有所不同。文中提供了一些例子,以说明在这个不断演变的过程中目前存在的广泛差异,并举例说明这些信息(无论是否新颖)如何能够被用于优化其商业价值。