Brody Baruch A
Center for Medical Ethics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2010 Sep;20(3):231-49. doi: 10.1353/ken.2010.0003.
Biotechnological inventions are sometimes based upon the traditional knowledge of indigenous communities about the beneficial properties of plants and animals. Some institutions have adopted the uniqueness of traditional knowledge approach, which maintains that the indigenous communities have sui generis rights to a share of the profits from these inventions. Others have adopted the protection of inventive steps approach, which maintains that the inventors are entitled to the full profits from the invention if it involves a non-obvious and novel inventive step. The article analyzes this debate at the Convention on Biological Diversity, at the World Intellectual Property Organization, and at the World Trade Organization. It concludes that the adherents of the uniqueness of traditional knowledge approach have not justified their claims.
生物技术发明有时基于土著社区关于动植物有益特性的传统知识。一些机构采用了传统知识独特性方法,该方法认为土著社区对这些发明的利润享有特殊权利。另一些机构则采用了保护创造性步骤方法,该方法认为如果发明涉及非显而易见且新颖的创造性步骤,发明者有权获得该发明的全部利润。本文分析了在《生物多样性公约》、世界知识产权组织和世界贸易组织中的这场辩论。结论是,传统知识独特性方法的支持者未能证明其主张的合理性。