• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Uncovering and improving upon the inherent deficiencies of radiology reporting through data mining.通过数据挖掘发现并改进放射学报告中的固有缺陷。
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):109-18. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9279-4.
2
Radiology reporting, past, present, and future: the radiologist's perspective.放射学报告的过去、现在与未来:放射科医生的视角
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 May;4(5):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.01.015.
3
Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future.成像与医疗保健中的计算机:现状与未来。
J Digit Imaging. 2000 Nov;13(4):145-56. doi: 10.1007/BF03168389.
4
Medical imaging and telemedicine - from medical data production, to processing, storing, and sharing: a short outlook.医学成像与远程医疗——从医学数据的产生、处理、存储到共享:简要展望。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2006 Sep-Oct;30(6-7):329-31. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
5
The radiology report of the future: a summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference.未来的放射学报告:2007年跨学会会议总结
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 May;5(5):626-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.12.015.
6
Business intelligence, data mining, and future trends.商业智能、数据挖掘及未来趋势。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jan;12(1):9-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.003.
7
[Current reporting in radiology : what will happen tomorrow?].[放射学的当前报告:明天会怎样?]
Radiologe. 2014 Jan;54(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s00117-013-2540-3.
8
Introduction to the special section on image management in the healthcare enterprise.医疗企业图像管理专题介绍。
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2007 Jan;11(1):1-6. doi: 10.1109/titb.2006.888236.
9
The radiology report of the future: the ignored impression.未来的放射学报告:被忽视的印象。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Sep;5(9):1017; author reply 1018. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.012.
10
[Current developments in DICOM and IHE].[DICOM和IHE的当前发展情况]
Radiologe. 2005 Aug;45(8):682-9. doi: 10.1007/s00117-005-1242-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Degree of Uncertainty in Reporting Imaging Findings for Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Secondary Analysis from a Pilot Randomized Diagnostic Trial.坏死性小肠结肠炎影像学检查结果报告中的不确定性程度:一项初步随机诊断试验的二次分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;12(5):511. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050511.
2
Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study.腹部和盆腔计算机断层扫描报告建议的响应评估:一项单中心、回顾性、病历审查研究。
Cureus. 2022 Jan 13;14(1):e21190. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21190. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Pediatric appendiceal ultrasound: maintaining accuracy, increasing determinacy and improving clinical outcomes following the introduction of a standardized reporting template.儿科阑尾超声:引入标准化报告模板后,提高准确性、确定性并改善临床结果。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Feb;51(2):265-272. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04820-z. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Detecting Technical Image Quality in Radiology Reports.在放射学报告中检测技术图像质量。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:780-788. eCollection 2018.
5
A Systematic Review on Healthcare Analytics: Application and Theoretical Perspective of Data Mining.关于医疗保健分析的系统评价:数据挖掘的应用与理论视角
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 May 23;6(2):54. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6020054.
6
Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creating a Standardized and Objective Methodology.医学报告中不确定性的定量分析:创建标准化和客观的方法。
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Apr;31(2):145-149. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0041-z.
7
Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation Part 2: Data-Driven Peer Review Selection and Assignment.通过智能自动化重新定义同行评审实践 第 2 部分:数据驱动的同行评审选择和分配。
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Dec;30(6):657-660. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0005-3.
8
Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation-Part 3: Automated Report Analysis and Data Reconciliation.通过智能自动化重新定义同行评审实践——第 3 部分:自动化报告分析和数据协调。
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Feb;31(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0006-2.
9
Impact of an Information Technology-Enabled Initiative on the Quality of Prostate Multiparametric MRI Reports.一项基于信息技术的举措对前列腺多参数磁共振成像报告质量的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Jul;22(7):827-33. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
Strategies for medical data extraction and presentation part 1: current limitations and deficiencies.医学数据提取与呈现策略 第1部分:当前的局限与不足
J Digit Imaging. 2015 Apr;28(2):123-6. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9769-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging.医学影像结构化报告的挑战、机遇和必要性。
J Digit Imaging. 2009 Dec;22(6):562-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9239-z.
2
Automating quality assurance for digital radiography.实现数字射线照相术的质量保证自动化。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Jul;6(7):486-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.12.008.
3
Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience.带有决策支持的放射学医嘱录入:初步临床经验
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Oct;3(10):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.05.006.
4
Clinical decision support in radiology: what is it, why do we need it, and what key features make it effective?放射学中的临床决策支持:它是什么,我们为何需要它,以及哪些关键特征使其有效?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Feb;3(2):142-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.11.008.
5
Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison.磁共振成像与计算机断层扫描在疑似急性中风患者急诊评估中的应用:一项前瞻性比较
Lancet. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):293-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60151-2.
6
On-line automatic slice positioning for brain MR imaging.用于脑部磁共振成像的在线自动切片定位
Neuroimage. 2005 Aug 1;27(1):222-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.035.
7
Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations.美国放射学服务的利用情况:检查方式、地区及人群的水平与趋势
Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):824-32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2343031536. Epub 2005 Jan 28.
8
A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM).人类大脑概率图谱与参考系统:国际脑图谱联盟(ICBM)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 29;356(1412):1293-322. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0915.
9
Improving the reliability of stroke subgroup classification using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria.使用急性卒中治疗中ORG 10172试验(TOAST)标准提高卒中亚组分类的可靠性。
Stroke. 2001 May;32(5):1091-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1091.
10
Language of the radiology report: primer for residents and wayward radiologists.放射学报告语言:住院医师及任性放射科医生入门指南
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Nov;175(5):1239-42. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.5.1751239.

通过数据挖掘发现并改进放射学报告中的固有缺陷。

Uncovering and improving upon the inherent deficiencies of radiology reporting through data mining.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Maryland VA Healthcare System, 10 North Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):109-18. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9279-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10278-010-9279-4
PMID:20162438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2837185/
Abstract

Uncertainty has been the perceived Achilles heel of the radiology report since the inception of the free-text report. As a measure of diagnostic confidence (or lack thereof), uncertainty in reporting has the potential to lead to diagnostic errors, delayed clinical decision making, increased cost of healthcare delivery, and adverse outcomes. Recent developments in data mining technologies, such as natural language processing (NLP), have provided the medical informatics community with an opportunity to quantify report concepts, such as uncertainty. The challenge ahead lies in taking the next step from quantification to understanding, which requires combining standardized report content, data mining, and artificial intelligence; thereby creating Knowledge Discovery Databases (KDD). The development of this database technology will expand our ability to record, track, and analyze report data, along with the potential to create data-driven and automated decision support technologies at the point of care. For the radiologist community, this could improve report content through an objective and thorough understanding of uncertainty, identifying its causative factors, and providing data-driven analysis for enhanced diagnosis and clinical outcomes.

摘要

自自由文本报告诞生以来,不确定性一直被认为是放射科报告的阿喀琉斯之踵。作为诊断信心的衡量标准(或缺乏信心),报告中的不确定性有可能导致诊断错误、临床决策延迟、医疗保健提供成本增加和不良后果。数据挖掘技术(如自然语言处理 (NLP))的最新发展为医学信息学社区提供了一个机会,可以量化报告概念,如不确定性。未来的挑战在于从量化到理解迈出下一步,这需要结合标准化报告内容、数据挖掘和人工智能;从而创建知识发现数据库 (KDD)。该数据库技术的发展将扩大我们记录、跟踪和分析报告数据的能力,并有潜力在护理点创建数据驱动和自动化决策支持技术。对于放射科医生社区来说,这可以通过客观和全面地了解不确定性来改善报告内容,确定其因果因素,并提供数据驱动的分析以增强诊断和临床结果。