Suppr超能文献

通过智能自动化重新定义同行评审实践——第 3 部分:自动化报告分析和数据协调。

Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation-Part 3: Automated Report Analysis and Data Reconciliation.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, 10 North Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.

, 11402 Newport Bay Drive, Berlin, MD, 21811, USA.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 2018 Feb;31(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0006-2.

Abstract

One method for addressing existing peer review limitations is the assignment of peer review cases on a completely blinded basis, in which the peer reviewer would create an independent report which can then be cross-referenced with the primary reader report of record. By leveraging existing computerized data mining techniques, one could in theory automate and objectify the process of report data extraction, classification, and analysis, while reducing time and resource requirements intrinsic to manual peer review report analysis. Once inter-report analysis has been performed, resulting inter-report discrepancies can be presented to the radiologist of record for review, along with the option to directly communicate with the peer reviewer through an electronic data reconciliation tool aimed at collaboratively resolving inter-report discrepancies and improving report accuracy. All associated report and reconciled data could in turn be recorded in a referenceable peer review database, which provides opportunity for context and user-specific education and decision support.

摘要

一种解决现有同行评审局限性的方法是完全盲法分配同行评审案例,其中评审员将创建一份独立的报告,然后可以与原始读者的记录报告进行交叉参考。通过利用现有的计算机数据挖掘技术,理论上可以实现报告数据提取、分类和分析的自动化和客观化,同时减少手动同行评审报告分析固有的时间和资源要求。一旦完成了报告间分析,可以向记录在案的放射科医生展示报告间差异,并提供通过电子数据核对工具与评审员直接沟通的选项,目的是协作解决报告间差异并提高报告准确性。所有相关的报告和核对后的数据都可以反过来记录在可参考的同行评审数据库中,这为上下文和用户特定的教育和决策支持提供了机会。

相似文献

4
Medical imaging data reconciliation, part 3: reconciliation of historical and current radiology report data.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Nov;8(11):768-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.04.021.
6
Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015).
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0193148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193148. eCollection 2018.
7
Automated Classification of Selected Data Elements from Free-text Diagnostic Reports for Clinical Research.
Methods Inf Med. 2016 Aug 5;55(4):373-80. doi: 10.3414/ME15-02-0019. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
Br Dent J. 2016 Feb 26;220(4):167-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.131.
9
Automated information extraction and structure-activity relationship analysis of cytochrome P450 substrates.
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Feb 28;51(2):378-85. doi: 10.1021/ci100334z. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: A sequential-explanatory study.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 26;3(2):e0000297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000297. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

2
Expert witness blinding strategies to mitigate bias in radiology malpractice cases: a comprehensive review of the literature.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Sep;11(9):868-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
3
Data mining in radiology.
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014 Apr;24(2):97-102. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.134367.
4
Uncovering and improving upon the inherent deficiencies of radiology reporting through data mining.
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):109-18. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9279-4.
5
Predictive data mining in clinical medicine: current issues and guidelines.
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Feb;77(2):81-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11.006. Epub 2006 Dec 26.
6
Data mining applications in healthcare.
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005 Spring;19(2):64-72.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验