Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, 10 North Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
, 11402 Newport Bay Drive, Berlin, MD, 21811, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Feb;31(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0006-2.
One method for addressing existing peer review limitations is the assignment of peer review cases on a completely blinded basis, in which the peer reviewer would create an independent report which can then be cross-referenced with the primary reader report of record. By leveraging existing computerized data mining techniques, one could in theory automate and objectify the process of report data extraction, classification, and analysis, while reducing time and resource requirements intrinsic to manual peer review report analysis. Once inter-report analysis has been performed, resulting inter-report discrepancies can be presented to the radiologist of record for review, along with the option to directly communicate with the peer reviewer through an electronic data reconciliation tool aimed at collaboratively resolving inter-report discrepancies and improving report accuracy. All associated report and reconciled data could in turn be recorded in a referenceable peer review database, which provides opportunity for context and user-specific education and decision support.
一种解决现有同行评审局限性的方法是完全盲法分配同行评审案例,其中评审员将创建一份独立的报告,然后可以与原始读者的记录报告进行交叉参考。通过利用现有的计算机数据挖掘技术,理论上可以实现报告数据提取、分类和分析的自动化和客观化,同时减少手动同行评审报告分析固有的时间和资源要求。一旦完成了报告间分析,可以向记录在案的放射科医生展示报告间差异,并提供通过电子数据核对工具与评审员直接沟通的选项,目的是协作解决报告间差异并提高报告准确性。所有相关的报告和核对后的数据都可以反过来记录在可参考的同行评审数据库中,这为上下文和用户特定的教育和决策支持提供了机会。