Math/Science Division, Babson College, Babson Park, MA 02457, USA.
Mol Biotechnol. 2010 Jun;45(2):187-97. doi: 10.1007/s12033-010-9252-y.
The "holy grail" of regenerative medicine is the identification of an undifferentiated progenitor cell that is pluripotent, patient specific, and ethically unambiguous. Such a progenitor cell must also be able to differentiate into functional, transplantable tissue, while avoiding the risks of immune rejection. With reports detailing aberrant genomic imprinting associated with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and reproductive cloning, the idea that human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) derived from surplus in vitro fertilized embryos or nuclear transfer ESCs (ntESCs) harvested from cloned embryos may harbor dangerous epigenetic errors has gained attention. Various progenitor cell sources have been proposed for human therapy, from hESCs to ntESCs, and from adult stem cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS and piPS cells). This review highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each of these technologies, with particular emphasis on epigenetic stability.
再生医学的“圣杯”是鉴定一种未分化的祖细胞,它具有多能性、患者特异性和明确的伦理道德。这种祖细胞还必须能够分化为功能性、可移植的组织,同时避免免疫排斥的风险。随着详细报告描述了与辅助生殖技术(ART)和生殖克隆相关的异常基因组印记,人们认为,源自体外受精胚胎剩余物的人类胚胎干细胞(hESCs)或从克隆胚胎中采集的核转移胚胎干细胞(ntESCs)可能存在危险的表观遗传错误。已经提出了各种祖细胞来源用于人类治疗,从 hESCs 到 ntESCs,从成人干细胞到诱导多能干细胞(iPS 和 piPS 细胞)。这篇综述强调了这些技术各自的优缺点,特别强调了表观遗传稳定性。