Lazarus Jeffrey V, Sihvonen-Riemenschneider Henna, Laukamm-Josten Ulrich, Wong Fiona, Liljestrand Jerker
Copenhagen School of Global Health, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Croat Med J. 2010 Feb;51(1):74-84. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.74.
To examine the effectiveness of interventions seeking to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, among young people in the European Union.
For this systematic review, we examined interventions that aimed at STI risk reduction and health promotion conducted in schools, clinics, and in the community for reported effectiveness (in changing sexual behavior and/or knowledge) between 1995 and 2005. We also reviewed study design and intervention methodology to discover how these factors affected the results, and we compiled a list of characteristics associated with successful and unsuccessful programs. Studies were eligible if they employed a randomized control design or intervention-only design that examined change over time and measured behavioral, biologic, or certain psychosocial outcomes.
Of the 19 studies that satisfied our review criteria, 11 reported improvements in the sexual health knowledge and/or attitudes of young people. Ten of the 19 studies aimed to change sexual risk behavior and 3 studies reported a significant reduction in a specific aspect of sexual risk behavior. Two of the interventions that led to behavioral change were peer-led and the other was teacher-led. Only 1 of the 8 randomized controlled trials reported any statistically significant change in sexual behavior, and then only for young females.
The young people studied were more accepting of peer-led than teacher-led interventions. Peer-led interventions were also more successful in improving sexual knowledge, though there was no clear difference in their effectiveness in changing behavior. The improvement in sexual health knowledge does not necessarily lead to behavioral change. While knowledge may help improve health-seeking behavior, additional interventions are needed to reduce STIs among young people.
研究旨在预防包括艾滋病毒在内的性传播感染(STIs)在欧盟年轻人中传播的干预措施的有效性。
在本次系统评价中,我们研究了1995年至2005年间在学校、诊所和社区开展的旨在降低性传播感染风险和促进健康的干预措施,以评估其报告的有效性(在改变性行为和/或知识方面)。我们还审查了研究设计和干预方法,以发现这些因素如何影响结果,并编制了一份与成功和不成功项目相关的特征清单。如果研究采用随机对照设计或仅干预设计,且研究了随时间的变化并测量了行为、生物学或某些心理社会结果,则该研究符合条件。
在符合我们审查标准的19项研究中,11项报告了年轻人性健康知识和/或态度的改善。19项研究中有10项旨在改变性风险行为,3项研究报告了性风险行为的特定方面有显著降低。导致行为改变的两项干预措施是由同伴主导的,另一项是由教师主导的。8项随机对照试验中只有1项报告了性行为有任何统计学上的显著变化,而且仅针对年轻女性。
所研究的年轻人对同伴主导的干预措施比教师主导的干预措施更易接受。同伴主导的干预措施在改善性知识方面也更成功,尽管它们在改变行为的有效性方面没有明显差异。性健康知识的改善不一定会导致行为改变。虽然知识可能有助于改善寻求健康的行为,但还需要额外的干预措施来减少年轻人中的性传播感染。