• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Systematic review of interventions to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, among young people in Europe.对欧洲年轻人中预防包括艾滋病毒在内的性传播感染传播的干预措施的系统评价。
Croat Med J. 2010 Feb;51(1):74-84. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.74.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
3
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
4
Population-based biomedical sexually transmitted infection control interventions for reducing HIV infection.基于人群的生物医学性传播感染控制干预措施以减少艾滋病毒感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16(3):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub3.
5
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural interventions for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections in young people aged 13-19: a systematic review and economic evaluation.13-19 岁青少年人群中预防性传播感染的行为干预措施的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(7):1-206, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14070.
6
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.
7
School-based interventions for preventing HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and pregnancy in adolescents.针对青少年预防艾滋病毒、性传播感染和怀孕的校本干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 8;11(11):CD006417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006417.pub3.
8
The Effectiveness of HIV Prevention Interventions in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Ethnic Minority Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社会经济地位不利的少数族裔女性中艾滋病病毒预防干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(12):e13-e21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304067. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
9
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.青少年医疗护理从儿科服务向成人健康服务的过渡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
10
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological, demographic, and health factors associated with HPV infection in Ecuadorian women.与厄瓜多尔女性 HPV 感染相关的生物、人口和健康因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;11:1158270. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1158270. eCollection 2023.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of sexually transmitted infection prevention practices among Ethiopian young people.埃塞俄比亚年轻人预防性传播感染措施的系统评价与荟萃分析
SAGE Open Med. 2023 Jan 4;11:20503121221145640. doi: 10.1177/20503121221145640. eCollection 2023.
3
Overcoming barriers to HPV vaccination in rural Vermont through a multicomponent peer-based approach.通过基于同伴的多组分方法克服佛蒙特州农村地区 HPV 疫苗接种障碍。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2122494. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2122494. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Barriers and facilitators to HIV prevention interventions for reducing risky sexual behavior among youth worldwide: a systematic review.全球范围内减少青年危险性行为的艾滋病预防干预措施的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07649-z.
5
Preventive practices toward sexually transmitted infections and their determinants among young people in Ethiopia: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚年轻人中预防性传播感染及其决定因素的实践:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0262982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262982. eCollection 2022.
6
Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention.社会网络研究对同伴主导和基于学校的性健康干预可行性研究中评估过程的贡献。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 10;11(1):12244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90852-w.
7
Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Associated Factors Among Night School Students in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚巴赫达尔市夜校学生性传播感染的预防及其相关因素
Infect Dis (Auckl). 2020 Jun 8;13:1178633720927374. doi: 10.1177/1178633720927374. eCollection 2020.
8
Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016.干预措施以降低青少年性传播感染的风险:2008-2016 年试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199421. eCollection 2018.
9
Cross-country Association of Press Freedom and LGBT freedom with prevalence of persons living with HIV: implication for global strategy against HIV/AIDS.新闻自由与 LGBT 自由的跨国关联与艾滋病毒感染者患病率:对全球防治艾滋病毒/艾滋病战略的启示
Glob Health Res Policy. 2018 Feb 9;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s41256-018-0061-3. eCollection 2018.
10
Effectiveness of School-Based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs in the USA: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美国基于学校的青少年怀孕预防项目的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Sci. 2018 May;19(4):468-489. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0861-6.

本文引用的文献

1
A multilevel analysis of condom use among adolescents in the European Union.欧盟青少年避孕套使用情况的多层次分析。
Public Health. 2009 Feb;123(2):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.014. Epub 2009 Jan 18.
2
Abstinence-plus programs for HIV infection prevention in high-income countries.高收入国家预防艾滋病毒感染的禁欲加干预项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD007006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007006.
3
Are condoms the answer to rising rates of non-HIV sexually transmitted infection? No.避孕套是解决非艾滋病毒性传播感染率上升问题的答案吗?不是。
BMJ. 2008 Jan 26;336(7637):185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39402.527766.AD.
4
Are condoms the answer to rising rates of non-HIV sexually transmitted infections? Yes.避孕套是应对非艾滋病毒性传播感染率上升的解决办法吗?答案是肯定的。
BMJ. 2008 Jan 26;336(7637):184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39402.488727.AD.
5
Abstinence-only programs for HIV infection prevention in high-income countries.高收入国家中仅强调禁欲的预防艾滋病毒感染项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD005421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005421.pub2.
6
A decade in review: building on the experiences of past adolescent STI/HIV interventions to optimise future prevention efforts.十年回顾:借鉴过去青少年性传播感染/艾滋病干预措施的经验,优化未来的预防工作。
Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Dec;82(6):431-6. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.018002.
7
Sexual health work in a playground: lessons learnt from the evaluation of a small-scale sexual health project.游乐场中的性健康工作:从一项小型性健康项目评估中获得的经验教训
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2002 Jan;28(1):18-22. doi: 10.1783/147118902101195956.
8
Is peer education the best approach for HIV prevention in schools? Findings from a randomized controlled trial.同伴教育是学校预防艾滋病病毒的最佳方法吗?一项随机对照试验的结果
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Jun;36(6):508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.03.005.
9
Pupil-led sex education in England (RIPPLE study): cluster-randomised intervention trial.英国由学生主导的性教育(涟漪研究):整群随机干预试验。
Lancet. 2004;364(9431):338-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16722-6.
10
The effects of AIDS prevention programs by lay health advisors for migrants in The Netherlands.荷兰外行人健康顾问针对移民开展的艾滋病预防项目的效果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 May;53(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00125-3.

对欧洲年轻人中预防包括艾滋病毒在内的性传播感染传播的干预措施的系统评价。

Systematic review of interventions to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, among young people in Europe.

作者信息

Lazarus Jeffrey V, Sihvonen-Riemenschneider Henna, Laukamm-Josten Ulrich, Wong Fiona, Liljestrand Jerker

机构信息

Copenhagen School of Global Health, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2010 Feb;51(1):74-84. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.74.

DOI:10.3325/cmj.2010.51.74
PMID:20162748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2829175/
Abstract

AIM

To examine the effectiveness of interventions seeking to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, among young people in the European Union.

METHODS

For this systematic review, we examined interventions that aimed at STI risk reduction and health promotion conducted in schools, clinics, and in the community for reported effectiveness (in changing sexual behavior and/or knowledge) between 1995 and 2005. We also reviewed study design and intervention methodology to discover how these factors affected the results, and we compiled a list of characteristics associated with successful and unsuccessful programs. Studies were eligible if they employed a randomized control design or intervention-only design that examined change over time and measured behavioral, biologic, or certain psychosocial outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 19 studies that satisfied our review criteria, 11 reported improvements in the sexual health knowledge and/or attitudes of young people. Ten of the 19 studies aimed to change sexual risk behavior and 3 studies reported a significant reduction in a specific aspect of sexual risk behavior. Two of the interventions that led to behavioral change were peer-led and the other was teacher-led. Only 1 of the 8 randomized controlled trials reported any statistically significant change in sexual behavior, and then only for young females.

CONCLUSION

The young people studied were more accepting of peer-led than teacher-led interventions. Peer-led interventions were also more successful in improving sexual knowledge, though there was no clear difference in their effectiveness in changing behavior. The improvement in sexual health knowledge does not necessarily lead to behavioral change. While knowledge may help improve health-seeking behavior, additional interventions are needed to reduce STIs among young people.

摘要

目的

研究旨在预防包括艾滋病毒在内的性传播感染(STIs)在欧盟年轻人中传播的干预措施的有效性。

方法

在本次系统评价中,我们研究了1995年至2005年间在学校、诊所和社区开展的旨在降低性传播感染风险和促进健康的干预措施,以评估其报告的有效性(在改变性行为和/或知识方面)。我们还审查了研究设计和干预方法,以发现这些因素如何影响结果,并编制了一份与成功和不成功项目相关的特征清单。如果研究采用随机对照设计或仅干预设计,且研究了随时间的变化并测量了行为、生物学或某些心理社会结果,则该研究符合条件。

结果

在符合我们审查标准的19项研究中,11项报告了年轻人性健康知识和/或态度的改善。19项研究中有10项旨在改变性风险行为,3项研究报告了性风险行为的特定方面有显著降低。导致行为改变的两项干预措施是由同伴主导的,另一项是由教师主导的。8项随机对照试验中只有1项报告了性行为有任何统计学上的显著变化,而且仅针对年轻女性。

结论

所研究的年轻人对同伴主导的干预措施比教师主导的干预措施更易接受。同伴主导的干预措施在改善性知识方面也更成功,尽管它们在改变行为的有效性方面没有明显差异。性健康知识的改善不一定会导致行为改变。虽然知识可能有助于改善寻求健康的行为,但还需要额外的干预措施来减少年轻人中的性传播感染。