Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP), University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199421. eCollection 2018.
Numerous studies have evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents in recent years, but their global effects remain unknown since 2008, the last date of a comprehensive review of prior studies.
This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of interventions to promote sexual health, reduce STIs and unplanned pregnancies targeted to adolescents available after 2008; and analyzing the moderators of their global efficacy.
We searched electronic databases and manual searches of some journals focused on STIs in May 2016. The studies evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce sexual risk in adolescents (age range: 11-19) anywhere in the world. Effect size of the relevant outcomes for sexual risk was calculated for every study. Analyses incorporated random-effect assumptions for each outcome. The homogeneity in the results was examined with the I2 statistic and its associated 95% confident interval.
Data from 63 studies (59,795 participants) were analyzed for behavioral and non-behavioral outcomes. In the short term, interventions had a positive impact in sexual health-related knowledge (Hedges'g = 1.01), attitudes (g = 0.29), self-efficacy toward condom use (g = 0.22), intention to refuse sex (g = 0.56), condom use intention (g = 0.46), and condom use (g = 0.38). In the medium term, positive effects observed at the short-term were maintained, although effect size significantly decreased in all variables. In the long term, interventions improved condom use (g = 0.47). Moderators of the efficacy are discussed.
Sexual health promotion interventions are effective to promote sexual health through increasing condom use. Effects on non-behavioral variables tend to decrease over time, while condom use increased in the long-term. Interventions should focus on the long-term efficacy, especially in behavioral and biological measures.
近年来,有许多研究评估了针对青少年的性传播感染风险干预措施的效果,但自 2008 年以来,即上一次对先前研究进行全面审查的日期以来,这些干预措施的全球效果仍不得而知。
本研究旨在评估 2008 年后针对青少年的促进性健康、减少性传播感染和意外怀孕的干预措施的效果,并分析其全球效果的调节因素。
我们于 2016 年 5 月检索了电子数据库和一些专注于性传播感染的期刊的手工检索。研究评估了在全球范围内减少青少年性风险的干预措施的效果(年龄范围:11-19 岁)。对于每一项研究,我们都计算了与性风险相关的相关结果的效果大小。分析采用了对每个结果的随机效应假设。使用 I2 统计量及其相关的 95%置信区间来检查结果的同质性。
对 63 项研究(59795 名参与者)的数据进行了行为和非行为结果的分析。在短期内,干预措施对性健康相关知识(Hedges'g = 1.01)、态度(g = 0.29)、使用避孕套的自我效能感(g = 0.22)、拒绝性的意愿(g = 0.56)、使用避孕套的意愿(g = 0.46)和避孕套的使用(g = 0.38)有积极的影响。在中期,短期观察到的积极效果得以维持,但所有变量的效果大小都显著降低。在长期,干预措施提高了避孕套的使用(g = 0.47)。讨论了疗效的调节因素。
性健康促进干预措施通过增加避孕套的使用,有效地促进性健康。随着时间的推移,对非行为变量的影响趋于减弱,而在长期内,避孕套的使用增加。干预措施应注重长期效果,特别是在行为和生物学措施方面。