Ulkü Cağatay Han
Department of Otolaryngology, Medicine Faculty of Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2010 Jan-Feb;20(1):7-12.
The aim of this study was to evaluate anatomic/audiologic outcomes of cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique and compare the results with the results of temporalis fascia tympanoplasty.
The charts of 40 patients who underwent surgery for primary type 1 tympanoplasty either with perichondrium-cartilage (12 males, 11 females; mean age 29.7 years; range 12 to 58 years) or fascia graft (9 males, 8 females; mean age 32.4 years; range 13 to 61 years) between January 2006 and January 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients in whom the only pathology was subtotal tympanic membrane perforation with intact ossicular chain were included in the study. Pre- and postoperative audiograms, postoperative otoscopy findings and follow-up time were obtained from the patient's chart in both groups. Reviewed parameters were the complete closure rates of the tympanic membrane perforation and the change in air bone gap at each of four frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz). Audiologic evaluation was made among the patients in whom complete ear drum closure was achieved in both groups.
Anatomic closure rates of the tympanic membrane perforation for perichondrium-cartilage and fascia group were 91.3% and 88.2%, respectively. Pre- and postoperative pure tone average air bone gap obtained at four frequencies for the perichondrium-cartilage and fascia group were 21.3+/-6.7 dB, 9.0+/-3.9 dB, and 21.2+/-6.9 dB, 8.5+/-4.4 dB, respectively. These findings revealed the overall gains of 12.3 dB for the cartilage-perichondrium group and 12.7 dB for the fascia group (p>0.05).
The anatomic and audiologic results after cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique are comparable to those after temporalis fascia tympanoplasty. Furthermore, the cartilage is more resistant than the fascia to the anatomic deformation and necrosis. Therefore, we advise its use as a routine tympanic membrane reconstruction material without concern about effecting audiometric resuls.
本研究旨在评估采用岛状技术的软骨鼓膜成形术的解剖学/听力学结果,并将结果与颞肌筋膜鼓膜成形术的结果进行比较。
回顾性分析2006年1月至2008年1月期间40例行原发性1型鼓膜成形术患者的病历,其中采用软骨膜 - 软骨(男12例,女11例;平均年龄29.7岁;范围12至58岁)或筋膜移植(男9例,女8例;平均年龄32.4岁;范围13至61岁)。研究纳入仅存在鼓膜穿孔且听骨链完整的患者。两组患者均从病历中获取术前和术后听力图、术后耳镜检查结果及随访时间。评估参数为鼓膜穿孔的完全闭合率以及四个频率(0.5、1、2、4kHz)处气骨导差的变化。对两组中鼓膜完全闭合的患者进行听力学评估。
软骨膜 - 软骨组和筋膜组鼓膜穿孔的解剖学闭合率分别为91.3%和88.2%。软骨膜 - 软骨组和筋膜组在四个频率处术前和术后的纯音平均气骨导差分别为21.3±6.7dB、9.0±3.9dB以及21.2±6.9dB、8.5±4.4dB。这些结果显示软骨 - 软骨膜组总体改善12.3dB,筋膜组改善12.7dB(p>0.05)。
采用岛状技术的软骨鼓膜成形术后的解剖学和听力学结果与颞肌筋膜鼓膜成形术相当。此外,软骨比筋膜更能抵抗解剖学变形和坏死。因此,我们建议将其作为常规鼓膜重建材料使用,而无需担心影响听力测试结果。