National Brain Research Centre, Nainwal More, Haryana, India.
J Neurophysiol. 2010 May;103(5):2400-16. doi: 10.1152/jn.00843.2009. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
Although the nature of gaze control regulating single saccades is relatively well documented, how such control is implemented to regulate multisaccade gaze shifts is not known. We used highly eccentric targets to elicit multisaccade gaze shifts and tested the ability of subjects to control the saccade sequence by presenting a second target on random trials. Their response allowed us to test the nature of control at many levels: before, during, and between saccades. Although the saccade sequence could be inhibited before it began, we observed clear signs of truncation of the first saccade, which confirmed that it could be inhibited in midflight as well. Using a race model that explains the control of single saccades, we estimated that it took about 100 ms to inhibit a planned saccade but took about 150 ms to inhibit a saccade during its execution. Although the time taken to inhibit was different, the high subject-wise correlation suggests a unitary inhibitory control acting at different levels in the oculomotor system. We also frequently observed responses that consisted of hypometric initial saccades, followed by secondary saccades to the initial target. Given the estimates of the inhibitory process provided by the model that also took into account the variances of the processes as well, the secondary saccades (average latency approximately 215 ms) should have been inhibited. Failure to inhibit the secondary saccade suggests that the intersaccadic interval in a multisaccade response is a ballistic stage. Collectively, these data indicate that the oculomotor system can control a response until a very late stage in its execution. However, if the response consists of multiple movements then the preparation of the second movement becomes refractory to new visual input, either because it is part of a preprogrammed sequence or as a consequence of being a corrective response to a motor error.
虽然注视控制调节单次眼跳的性质已得到较为充分的记录,但如何实施这种控制来调节多次眼跳的注视转移尚不清楚。我们使用高度偏心的目标来引发多次眼跳注视转移,并在随机试验中呈现第二个目标来测试受试者控制眼跳序列的能力。他们的反应使我们能够在多个层面上测试控制的性质:在眼跳之前、期间和之间。尽管眼跳序列可以在开始之前被抑制,但我们观察到第一个眼跳明显被截断的迹象,这证实了它也可以在飞行中途被抑制。使用一个解释单眼跳控制的竞赛模型,我们估计抑制一个计划中的眼跳需要大约 100 毫秒,但在执行过程中抑制眼跳需要大约 150 毫秒。尽管抑制所需的时间不同,但高个体相关性表明,在眼动系统的不同水平上存在一个统一的抑制控制。我们还经常观察到这样的反应,即最初的眼跳幅度不足,然后是对初始目标的二次眼跳。考虑到模型提供的抑制过程的估计值,该模型还考虑了过程的方差,二次眼跳(平均潜伏期约为 215 毫秒)应该已经被抑制了。未能抑制二次眼跳表明,多次眼跳反应中的眼跳间隔是一个弹道阶段。总的来说,这些数据表明,眼动系统可以在其执行的很晚阶段控制一个反应。然而,如果反应由多个运动组成,那么第二个运动的准备就会对新的视觉输入产生抗性,要么是因为它是预编程序列的一部分,要么是因为它是对运动错误的纠正反应。