Suppr超能文献

紫杉醇/卡铂/依托泊苷与吉西他滨/伊立替康一线治疗不明原发灶癌患者:一项随机、III 期 Sarah Cannon 肿瘤学研究联盟试验。

Paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide versus gemcitabine/irinotecan in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a randomized, phase III Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium Trial.

机构信息

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Cancer J. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):70-5. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181c6aa89.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the results of empiric first-line therapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide (PCE) versus gemcitabine/irinotecan, both followed by single-agent gefitinib, in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated carcinoma of unknown primary site were randomized to receive either PCE or gemcitabine/irinotecan. Responding and stable patients continued treatment for 4 to 6 cycles. Patients with no evidence of tumor progression at that time received single-agent gefitinib until tumor progression. The trial was designed to detect an improvement in the 2-year survival rate from 20% to 30%.

RESULTS

Between September 2003 and July 2008, 198 patients entered this multicenter, community-based trial. Because of slow accrual, the trial was stopped short of its target accrual of 320 patients. Clinical characteristics were comparable for patients receiving PCE (N = 93) and gemcitabine/irinotecan (N = 105). PCE and gemcitabine/irinotecan produced similar 2-year survival (15% vs. 18%), median survival (7.4 months vs. 8.5 months), median progression-free survival (3.3 months vs. 5.3 months), and response rate (18% vs. 18%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and red blood cells transfusions were more common with PCE; diarrhea was more common with gemcitabine/irinotecan. The median duration of gefitinib maintenance was 3 months, suggesting no role as a maintenance therapy in this setting.

DISCUSSION

The PCE and gemcitabine/irinotecan regimens have comparable efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Gemcitabine/irinotecan is the preferable regimen, due to its favorable toxicity profile. However, the moderate efficacy of both regimens underscores the need for novel treatment approaches in this patient population.

摘要

目的

比较紫杉醇/卡铂/依托泊苷(PCE)与吉西他滨/伊立替康一线治疗初治不明原发灶癌的疗效,两者均序贯单药吉非替尼治疗。

方法

未经治疗的不明原发灶癌患者被随机分配接受 PCE 或吉西他滨/伊立替康治疗。有反应和稳定的患者继续接受 4 至 6 个周期的治疗。此时无肿瘤进展证据的患者接受单药吉非替尼治疗,直至肿瘤进展。该试验旨在检测 2 年生存率从 20%提高到 30%的改善。

结果

2003 年 9 月至 2008 年 7 月,198 例患者入组该多中心社区为基础的试验。由于入组缓慢,试验提前结束,未达到预期的 320 例患者入组目标。接受 PCE(N=93)和吉西他滨/伊立替康(N=105)的患者临床特征相似。PCE 和吉西他滨/伊立替康的 2 年生存率(15% vs. 18%)、中位生存时间(7.4 个月 vs. 8.5 个月)、中位无进展生存时间(3.3 个月 vs. 5.3 个月)和反应率(18% vs. 18%)相似。PCE 更常见 3/4 级中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、贫血、发热性中性粒细胞减少和红细胞输注;吉西他滨/伊立替康更常见腹泻。吉非替尼维持治疗的中位时间为 3 个月,提示在这种情况下,吉非替尼不能作为维持治疗。

讨论

PCE 和吉西他滨/伊立替康方案在初治不明原发灶癌患者的一线治疗中具有相当的疗效。由于其良好的毒性特征,吉西他滨/伊立替康是首选方案。然而,两种方案的疗效均中等,突显了在这一患者人群中需要新的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验