Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximillians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17(5):254-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328336ae9e.
Sonography is an established diagnostic procedure in hospitals, but is not routinely used in prehospital emergency medicine. Several studies have addressed the use of ultrasound during helicopter flights and in emergency rooms, few in prehospital settings, but most focused on abdominal blunt trauma. Several case reports describe crucial decisions distinguished by ultrasound.
In this study, four different handheld ultrasound systems in 4 helicopters and one emergency vehicle were used over a cumulative period of 3 years. Incidence, feasibility, indication, diagnoses and exploration time (in subgroups) were investigated in an overall profile of emergency patients, encompassing the area of internal medicine.
On 971 missions ultrasound systems were available. In 17% of the cases ultrasound was considered valuable, in 144 patients (14.8%) sonographic studies were performed. Additional information could be given in 130 cases (90%). Compared with the available clinical data (return rate of 76%) there were no false-positive findings during this study, resulting in a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%, showing this technique to be reliable. Sensitivity was 85%, accuracy was 96% and negative predictive value was 95%.
Ultrasound is the only imaging modality and a useful diagnostic tool in prehospital emergency medicine. Helpful information can be provided in at least one of six cases (or even more) in a trauma-dominated collective. Examination time is short; it will not significantly delay medical care. Ultrasound examination could improve triage in cases of more than one patient in disaster medicine, but further studies are necessary.
超声检查在医院是一种既定的诊断程序,但在院前急救医学中并不常规使用。有几项研究涉及直升机飞行和急诊室中的超声使用,很少有研究涉及院前环境,但大多数研究集中在腹部钝性创伤上。有几个病例报告描述了通过超声做出的关键决策。
在这项研究中,4 架直升机和 1 辆急救车上的 4 种不同的手持式超声系统在 3 年的时间里累计使用。对所有内科急救患者进行了整体分析,研究了发生率、可行性、适应证、诊断和探查时间(在亚组中)。
在 971 次任务中,超声系统均可使用。在 17%的情况下,超声被认为是有价值的,144 名患者(14.8%)进行了超声检查。在 130 例(90%)中可以提供更多信息。与可用的临床数据(返回率为 76%)相比,在本研究中没有假阳性发现,因此该技术具有 100%的特异性和阳性预测值,表明该技术是可靠的。敏感性为 85%,准确性为 96%,阴性预测值为 95%。
超声是院前急救医学中唯一的成像方式和有用的诊断工具。在以创伤为主的群体中,至少有六分之一(甚至更多)的病例可以提供有帮助的信息。检查时间很短;它不会显著延迟医疗护理。在灾难医学中,对于有多名患者的情况,超声检查可以改善分诊,但还需要进一步研究。