Suppr超能文献

一般性的身体活动还是特定的运动与运动能力有关?

Is generic physical activity or specific exercise associated with motor abilities?

机构信息

Urho Kaleva Kekkonen Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Sep;42(9):1760-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d83086.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Evidence of the effect of leisure time physical activity (LTPA) modes on the motor abilities of a mature population is scarce. The purpose of this study was to compare the motor abilities of physically active and inactive men and women and to examine the associations of different exercise modes and former and recent LTPA (R-LTPA) with motor ability and various physical tests.

METHODS

The LTPA of the participants (men n = 69, women n = 79; aged 41-47 yr) was ascertained by a modified Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire, including questions on the frequency, duration, and intensity of R-LTPA and former LTPA and on exercise modes. Motor abilities in terms of balance, agility, and coordination were assessed with a battery of nine tests supplemented with five physical fitness tests. Multiple statistical methods were used in analyses that were conducted separately for men and women.

RESULTS

The MET-hours per week of R-LTPA correlated statistically significantly with the tests of agility and static balance (rs = -0.28, P = 0.022; rs = -0.25, P = 0.043, respectively) among men and with the static balance (rs = 0.41), 2-km walking (rs = 0.36), step squat (rs = 0.36) (P < or = 0.001, respectively), and static back endurance (rs = 0.25, P = 0.024) among women. In the stepwise regression among men, the most frequent statistically significant predictor was the playing of several games. For women, a history of LTPA for more than 3 yr was the strongest predictor for good results in almost all tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with long-term and regular LTPA had better motor performance, and especially a variety of games improve components of motor ability. Diverse, regular, and long-term exercise including both specific training and general activity develops both motor abilities and physical fitness.

摘要

目的

关于休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)模式对成熟人群运动能力影响的证据很少。本研究的目的是比较活跃和不活跃的男性和女性的运动能力,并研究不同运动模式以及以往和近期 LTPA(R-LTPA)与运动能力和各种身体测试的关系。

方法

参与者的 LTPA(男性 n = 69,女性 n = 79;年龄 41-47 岁)通过改良的体力活动准备问卷确定,包括关于 R-LTPA 和以往 LTPA 的频率、持续时间和强度以及运动模式的问题。使用九项测试的电池以及五项体能测试来评估平衡、敏捷和协调能力。分析分别针对男性和女性进行了多种统计方法。

结果

R-LTPA 的 MET 小时/周与男性的敏捷和静态平衡测试(rs = -0.28,P = 0.022;rs = -0.25,P = 0.043)以及女性的静态平衡(rs = 0.41)、2 公里步行(rs = 0.36)、台阶深蹲(rs = 0.36)(P <或= 0.001)和静态背部耐力(rs = 0.25,P = 0.024)呈统计学显著相关。在男性的逐步回归中,最常被统计预测的是玩多种游戏。对于女性,LTPA 持续时间超过 3 年是几乎所有测试中良好成绩的最强预测因素。

结论

长期且有规律进行 LTPA 的参与者具有更好的运动表现,尤其是多种游戏可以提高运动能力的各个方面。多样化、有规律且长期的运动,包括特定训练和一般活动,既能提高运动能力,又能提高身体素质。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验