Suppr超能文献

傅里叶变换光谱仪与哈达玛变换光谱仪:有限比较

Fourier and Hadamard transform spectrometers: a limited comparison.

作者信息

Tai M H, Harwit M

出版信息

Appl Opt. 1976 Nov 1;15(11):2664-6. doi: 10.1364/AO.15.002664.

Abstract

We establish an encoding figure of merit for a detector-noise limited Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS) and compare it to the comparable figure for a Hadamard transform spectrometer (HTS). If N measurements are made to establish N spectral densities, the mean square errors obtained with the Fourier system are a factor of 2 greater than for the analogous Hadamard system. The limitation of the Fourier system is partly that it does not truly Fourier analyze the radiation. Instead a cosine squared modulation is imposed on the different spectral frequencies. An additional difficulty is that neither the cosine nor the cosine squared functions form an orthonormal set. This makes the Fellgett's advantage (root-mean-squared figure of merit) for a single detector Michelson interferometer a factor of (N/8)(1/2) greater than for a conventional grating instrument-rather than (N/2)(1/2) as maintained in standard texts. The theoretical limit, which may not be realizable with practical instruments, would be (N)(1/2).

摘要

我们为探测器噪声受限的傅里叶变换光谱仪(FTS)建立了一个编码品质因数,并将其与哈达玛变换光谱仪(HTS)的可比品质因数进行比较。如果进行N次测量以确定N个光谱密度,傅里叶系统获得的均方误差比类似的哈达玛系统大2倍。傅里叶系统的局限性部分在于它没有真正对辐射进行傅里叶分析。相反,它对不同的光谱频率施加了余弦平方调制。另一个难题是,余弦函数和余弦平方函数都不构成正交归一集合。这使得单探测器迈克尔逊干涉仪的费尔盖特优势(均方根品质因数)比传统光栅仪器大(N/8)(1/2)倍,而不是如标准文献中所述的(N/2)(1/2)倍。实际仪器可能无法实现的理论极限是(N)(1/2)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验