Rangarajan Kanchana, Subramanian Arulselvi, Gandhi Jatin S, Saraf Namit, Sharma Vijay, Farooque Kamran
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010 Jan;3(1):4-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.58652.
Head injury, severe acidosis, hypothermia, massive transfusion and hypoxia often complicate traumatic coagulopathy. First line investigations such as prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, fibrinogen level, platelet count and D-dimer levels help in the initial assessment of coagulopathy in a trauma victim.
To study the coagulation profile in patients of orthopedic trauma.
Prospective study.
Patients with head injury, severe acidosis, massive transfusion and severe hypoxia were excluded from the study. Coagulation parameters were evaluated at three intervals, at the time of admission, intra operatively and in the postoperative period.
Chi-square test was used for analysis of categorical variables. For comparison between groups, two- way ANOVA was used.
Of the 48 patients studied, 38 (80%) had normal DIC scores upon admission and only 10 (20%) had mild DIC scores at the time of admission. The median Injury Severity Score was 34 and they did not correlate with DIC scores. Fibrinogen levels alone were significantly different, increased progressively (mean pre op, intra op and post op levels 518 +/- 31,582 +/- 35 and 643 +/- 27 respectively; P </= 0.02) since the time of admission in these patients. All the other parameters remained unchanged. Further large scale prospective studies would be required to correlate elevated fibrinogen levels with the type of trauma or surgery.
头部损伤、严重酸中毒、体温过低、大量输血和缺氧常使创伤性凝血病复杂化。凝血酶原时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间、凝血酶时间、纤维蛋白原水平、血小板计数和D-二聚体水平等一线检查有助于对创伤患者的凝血病进行初步评估。
研究骨科创伤患者的凝血情况。
前瞻性研究。
排除头部损伤、严重酸中毒、大量输血和严重缺氧的患者。在入院时、术中及术后三个时间段评估凝血参数。
卡方检验用于分析分类变量。组间比较采用双向方差分析。
在研究的48例患者中,38例(80%)入院时DIC评分正常,仅10例(20%)入院时有轻度DIC评分。损伤严重程度评分中位数为34,与DIC评分无关。自入院以来,仅纤维蛋白原水平有显著差异,呈逐渐升高趋势(术前、术中及术后平均水平分别为518±31、582±35和643±27;P≤0.02)。所有其他参数保持不变。需要进一步的大规模前瞻性研究来将升高的纤维蛋白原水平与创伤或手术类型相关联。