Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Joint Research Centre-European Commission, 111 Retieseweg, 2440 Geel, Belgium.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 Mar;396(6):2349-61. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-3436-y. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
This paper describes the application of TiO(2) nano-particles (anatase form) for the solid-phase extraction of iron from coastal seawater samples. We investigated the adsorption processes by infra-red spectroscopy. We compared in batch and on-(mini)column extraction approaches (0.1 and 0.05 g TiO(2) per sample, respectively), combined to external calibration and detection by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry at medium mass resolution. Globally, this titania phase was slightly more efficient with seawater than with ultra-pure water, although between pH 2 and pH 7, the Fe retention efficiency progressed more in ultra-pure water than in seawater (6.9 versus 4.8 times improvement). Different reaction schemes are proposed between Fe(III) species and the two main categories of titania sites at pH 2 (adsorption of FeL(x) via possibly the mediation of chlorides) and at pH 7 (adsorption of Fe(OH)(2) and precipitation of Fe(OH)(3)). Under optimised conditions, the inlet system was pre-cleaned by pumping 6% HCl for approximately 2 h, and the column was conditioned by aspirating ultra-pure water (1.7 g min(-1)) and 0.05% ammonia (0.6 g min(-1)) for 1 min. Then 3 g seawater sample was loaded at the same flow rate while being mixed on-line with 0.05% ammonia at 0.6 g min(-1) to adjust the pH to 7. The iron retained on the oxide powder was then eluted with 3 g 6% HCl (<0.002% residual salinity in the separated samples). The overall procedural blank was 220 +/- 46 (2 s, n = 16) ng Fe kg(-1) (the titania was renewed in the column every 20 samples, with 2-min rinsing in between samples with 6% HCl at 1.5 g min(-1)). The recovery estimated from the Canadian certified reference material CASS-2 was 69.5 +/- 7.6% (2 s, n = 4). Typically, the relative combined uncertainty (k = 2) estimated for the measurement of approximately 1 microg Fe kg(-1) (0.45 microm filtered and acidified to pH 1.5) of seawater was approximately 12%. We applied our method to a similar sample, from the coastal region of the North Sea. The agreement well within stated uncertainties of our result with the value obtained independently by isotope dilution mass spectrometry further validated our method.
本文介绍了 TiO(2)纳米粒子(锐钛矿形式)在从沿海海水样品中固相萃取铁中的应用。我们通过红外光谱研究了吸附过程。我们比较了批处理和(微型)柱萃取方法(分别为每个样品 0.1 和 0.05 g TiO(2)),与外部校准相结合,并通过电感耦合等离子体质谱法在中等质量分辨率下进行检测。总体而言,这种钛氧化物在海水中的效率略高于超纯水,尽管在 pH 2 至 pH 7 之间,铁的保留效率在超纯水中的进展大于在海水中(提高了 6.9 倍和 4.8 倍)。在 pH 2 下(通过可能的氯化物介导吸附 FeL(x))和 pH 7 下(吸附 Fe(OH)(2)和沉淀 Fe(OH)(3)),提出了两种主要的 TiO(2)位点与 Fe(III)物种之间的不同反应方案。在优化条件下,通过抽吸约 2 小时 6% HCl 来预先清洁入口系统,通过抽吸超纯水(1.7 g min(-1)) 和 0.05%氨(0.6 g min(-1)) 来对柱进行预处理 1 分钟。然后以相同的流速加载 3 g 海水样品,同时在线混合 0.05%氨以将 pH 调节至 7。然后用 3 g 6% HCl(分离样品中残留盐度<0.002%)洗脱保留在氧化物粉末上的铁。整个程序空白为 220 ± 46(2 s,n = 16)ng Fe kg(-1)(每 20 个样品更换一次柱中的 TiO(2),用 6% HCl 在 1.5 g min(-1)之间以 2 分钟的间隔冲洗样品)。从加拿大认证参考物质 CASS-2 估计的回收率为 69.5 ± 7.6%(2 s,n = 4)。通常,对于约 1 microg Fe kg(-1)(0.45 µm 过滤并酸化至 pH 1.5)海水的测量,估计相对组合不确定度(k = 2)约为 12%。我们将我们的方法应用于北海沿海地区的类似样品。我们的结果与同位素稀释质谱法独立获得的值在规定的不确定度范围内非常吻合,进一步验证了我们的方法。