Donnellan Clare, Preston Cathy, Moayyedi Paul, Sharma Nav
Gastroenterology, University of Leeds, Room 190A, B Floor, Clarendon Wing, LGI, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK, LS1 3EX.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17(2):CD003245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003245.pub3.
BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) - reflux of stomach contents +/- bile into the oesophagus causing symptoms such as heartburn and acid reflux - is a common relapsing and remitting disease which often requires long-term maintenance therapy. Patients with GORD may have oesophagitis (inflammation of the oesophagus) or a normal endoscopy (endoscopy negative reflux disease or ENRD). OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of continuous maintenance therapy in adults with GORD (both ENRD and healed oesophagitis). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003), CINAHL (1982-2003), and the National Research Register (Issue 2, 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled studies comparing PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, sucralfate and combinations either in comparison to another treatment regimen or to placebo in adults with reflux oesophagitis and ENRD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author extracted data from included trials and a second author carried out an unblinded check. Two authors independently assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Maintenance of patients with healed oesophagitis: For a healing dose of PPI (generally the standard dose given by the manufacturer) versus placebo, the relative risk (RR) for oesophagitis relapse was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.36); versus H2RAs the RR was 0.36 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.46) and versus maintenance PPIs the RR was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.73). However overall adverse effects were also more common and headaches were more common when comparing healing PPIs to H2RAs.For a maintenance dose of PPI (half of the standard dose) versus placebo, the RR for oesophagitis relapse was 0.46 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57) and versus H2RAs the RR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.69). Overall adverse effects were more common.H2RAs were of marginal help but beneficial for symptomatic relief. Prokinetics and sucralfate were also more effective than placebo.For ENRD patients: Limited data with one RCT showed benefit for omeprazole 10 mg once daily over placebo (RR 0.4; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.53). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review support the long-term treatment of oesophagitis to prevent relapse, both endoscopically and symptomatically. Healing doses of PPIs are more effective than all other therapies, although there is an increase in overall adverse effects compared to placebo, and headache occurrence compared to H2RAs. H2RAs prevent relapse more effectively than placebo, demonstrating a role for PPI-intolerant patients. Prokinetics and sucralfate both show benefit over placebo, but the former is no longer licenced. There is only limited data for ENRD.
背景:胃食管反流病(GORD)——胃内容物伴或不伴胆汁反流至食管,引起烧心和反酸等症状——是一种常见的复发缓解性疾病,常需长期维持治疗。GORD患者可能患有食管炎(食管炎症)或内镜检查正常(内镜阴性反流病或ENRD)。 目的:评估持续维持治疗对成人GORD患者(包括ENRD和已愈合食管炎患者)的疗效。 检索策略:我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2003年第2期《Cochrane图书馆》)、MEDLINE(1966年至2003年)、EMBASE(1980年至2003年)、CINAHL(1982 - 2003年)以及国家研究注册库(2003年第2期)和文章的参考文献列表。我们还联系了该领域的制造商和研究人员。 选择标准:随机对照研究,比较质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)、H2受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)、促动力药、硫糖铝及其联合用药与其他治疗方案或安慰剂,用于反流性食管炎和ENRD的成人患者。 数据收集与分析:一位作者从纳入的试验中提取数据,另一位作者进行非盲法核对。两位作者独立评估试验质量。联系研究作者获取更多信息。 主要结果:已愈合食管炎患者的维持治疗:对于质子泵抑制剂的愈合剂量(通常为制造商给出的标准剂量)与安慰剂相比,食管炎复发的相对风险(RR)为0.26(95%置信区间(CI)0.19至0.36);与H2RAs相比,RR为0.36(95%CI 0.28至0.46),与维持剂量的质子泵抑制剂相比,RR为0.63(95%CI 0.55至0.73)。然而,总体不良反应也更常见,与H2RAs相比,使用愈合剂量的质子泵抑制剂时头痛更常见。对于质子泵抑制剂的维持剂量(标准剂量的一半)与安慰剂相比,食管炎复发的RR为0.46(95%CI 0.38至0.57),与H2RAs相比,RR为0.57(95%CI 0.47至0.69)。总体不良反应更常见。H2RAs有一定帮助,但对症状缓解有益。促动力药和硫糖铝也比安慰剂更有效。对于ENRD患者:一项随机对照试验的有限数据显示,每日一次服用10毫克奥美拉唑比安慰剂更有益(RR 0.4;95%CI 0.29至0.53)。 作者结论:本综述的结果支持对食管炎进行长期治疗以预防复发,包括内镜和症状方面。质子泵抑制剂的愈合剂量比所有其他疗法更有效,尽管与安慰剂相比总体不良反应增加,与H2RAs相比头痛发生率增加。H2RAs比安慰剂更有效地预防复发,表明其在不耐受质子泵抑制剂的患者中发挥作用。促动力药和硫糖铝均显示比安慰剂有益,但前者已不再有许可证。关于ENRD的数据有限。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010-2-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-4-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-2-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-4-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-8-22
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016-7-11
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016-4-14