Müller Michael, Kääb Max, Tohtz Stephan, Haas Norbert P, Perka Carsten
Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, CHARITE - University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2009 Dec;75(6):776-83.
Periprosthetic fractures of the femur present a challenging surgical problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) which were treated with internal fixation or stem revision. Depending on the fracture type in the Duncan-Vancouver-Classification, 42 patients with PFF were treated either with a Fixateur interne (n = 23) in cases with type B1 or C fractures, or with stem revision (n = 19) in cases with type B2/B3 fractures. Follow-up rate was 78% over 24 months. All but two fractures showed radiological signs of healing. Implant failure was noted in 4 cases in the LISS group. The Lysholm and Larson scores were respectively 75.5 and 71 in patients undergoing stem revision, versus 74.5 and 69 in those treated with LISS fixation. Even taking into account the higher risk of implant failure, the treatment with LISS internal fixation has shown to be a reasonable method in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures without stem loosening.
股骨假体周围骨折是一个具有挑战性的外科问题。本研究的目的是评估采用内固定或柄翻修治疗的股骨假体周围骨折(PFF)的疗效。根据邓肯-温哥华分类法中的骨折类型,42例PFF患者,B1型或C型骨折采用骨外固定器(n = 23)治疗,B2/B3型骨折采用柄翻修(n = 19)治疗。24个月的随访率为78%。除两例骨折外,所有骨折均显示出愈合的影像学迹象。LISS组有4例出现植入物失败。柄翻修患者的Lysholm和Larson评分分别为75.5和71,而采用LISS固定治疗的患者分别为74.5和69。即使考虑到植入物失败的较高风险,LISS内固定治疗在治疗无柄松动的假体周围骨折方面已被证明是一种合理的方法。