Suppr超能文献

推荐处理时间和延长处理时间下釉质和牙本质的黏结强度。

Adhesive bond strengths to enamel and dentin using recommended and extended treatment times.

机构信息

Department of General Dentistry, Creighton University Medical Center, School of Dentistry, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):112-9. doi: 10.2341/09-081-L.

Abstract

This study examined the effect of different enamel and dentin conditioning times on the shear bond strength of a resin composite using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems. Shear bond strengths were determined following treatment of flat ground human enamel and dentin surfaces (4000 grit) with 11 adhesive systems: 1) AdheSE One Viva Pen-(ASE), 2) Adper Prompt L-Pop-(PLP), 3) Adper Single Bond Plus-(SBP), 4) Clearfil SE Bond-(CSE), 5) Clearfil S3 Bond-(CS3), 6) OptiBond All-In-One-(OBA), 7) OptiBond Solo Plus-(OBS), 8) Peak SE-(PSE), 9) Xeno IV-(X4), 10) Xeno V-(X5) and 11) XP Bond-(XPB) using recommended treatment times and an extended treatment time of 60 seconds (n = 10/group). Composite (Z100) to enamel and dentin bond strengths (24 hours) were determined using Ultradent fixtures and debonded with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The data were analyzed with a three-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's LSD post hoc test. The highest shear bond strengths (MPa) to enamel were achieved by the three etch-and-rinse systems at both the recommended treatment time (SBP-40.5 +/- 6.1; XPB-38.7 +/- 3.7; OBS- 35.2 +/- 6.2) and the extended treatment time (SBP-44.5 +/- 8.1; XPB-40.9 +/- 5.7; OBS-35.0 +/- 4.5). Extending the enamel treatment time did not produce a significant change (p > 0.05) in bond strength for the 11 adhesive systems tested. OBS generated the highest (46.2 +/- 7.9) bond strengths to dentin at the recommended treatment time. At the extended treatment time X4 (42.2 +/- 11.7), PSE (42.1 +/- 9.7) and OBS (41.4 +/- 8.0) produced the highest bond strengths to dentin. The bond strength change between recommend and extended treatment times was significant (p < 0.05) for PSE, but the other 10 systems did not exhibit any significant change.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨不同牙釉质和牙本质处理时间对使用酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀黏结系统的树脂复合材料的剪切黏结强度的影响。处理后,对经过 4000 目砂纸打磨的平整人牙釉质和牙本质表面(4000 目砂纸)用 11 种黏结系统进行处理:1)AdheSE One Viva Pen(ASE),2)Adper Prompt L-Pop(PLP),3)Adper Single Bond Plus(SBP),4)Clearfil SE Bond(CSE),5)Clearfil S3 Bond(CS3),6)OptiBond All-In-One(OBA),7)OptiBond Solo Plus(OBS),8)Peak SE(PSE),9)Xeno IV(X4),10)Xeno V(X5)和 11)XP Bond(XPB),使用推荐的处理时间和 60 秒的延长处理时间(n = 10/组)。使用 Ultradent 夹具测定 24 小时后复合树脂(Z100)与牙釉质和牙本质的黏结强度,并以 1mm/min 的十字头速度进行分离。采用三因素方差分析(ANOVA)和 Fisher LSD 事后检验对数据进行分析。在推荐的处理时间下,三种酸蚀-冲洗系统的牙釉质剪切黏结强度最高(MPa):SBP-40.5 ± 6.1;XPB-38.7 ± 3.7;OBS-35.2 ± 6.2)和延长的处理时间(SBP-44.5 ± 8.1;XPB-40.9 ± 5.7;OBS-35.0 ± 4.5)。对 11 种黏结系统进行测试,延长牙釉质处理时间不会对黏结强度产生显著变化(p>0.05)。OBS 在推荐的处理时间下对牙本质的黏结强度最高(46.2 ± 7.9)。在延长的处理时间下,X4(42.2 ± 11.7)、PSE(42.1 ± 9.7)和 OBS(41.4 ± 8.0)对牙本质的黏结强度最高。PSE 的推荐和延长处理时间之间的黏结强度变化具有统计学意义(p<0.05),但其他 10 个系统没有显示出任何显著变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验