• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 LASIK 术后角膜扩张的风险因素评分系统在正常眼地形中的应用。

Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography.

机构信息

Gavin Herbert Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;26(4):241-50. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100212-02.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20100212-02
PMID:20166627
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess a previously published risk score system for predicting postoperative LASIK ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography.

METHODS

A retrospective review of one surgeon's LASIK database was performed for eyes with Randleman ectasia risk scores based on patient age <30 years, preoperative central corneal thickness <510 microm, residual stromal bed thickness <300 microm, and/or a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent >-8.00 diopters that had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS Of 1702 eyes with myopic errors and normal topographies, 35 (2.0%) eyes had a combined risk score between 5 and 9 points, 92 (5.4%) eyes had a combined risk score of 4 or higher, and 208 (12.2%) eyes had a combined score of 3 or higher. None of these eyes developed ectasia, whereas 3 eyes with preoperative topographic keratoconus with no other risk factors developed ectasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The current risk score system would have eliminated 5.4% of eyes with 4 or more points from LASIK surgery, and would have also required the surgeon to advise an additional 6.8% of eyes with a score of 3 that they were at "moderate risk" and should "proceed with caution." In eyes with normal preoperative topographies, the scoring system may not accurately predict whether patients are at increased risk for developing postoperative LASIK ectasia.

摘要

目的

评估先前发表的一种预测 LASIK 术后角膜扩张风险评分系统,该系统适用于术前角膜形态正常的患者。

方法

对一位医生的 LASIK 数据库进行回顾性分析,纳入 Randleman 角膜扩张风险评分≥5 分的患者,评分标准为:患者年龄<30 岁、术前中央角膜厚度<510μm、剩余基质床厚度<300μm 和/或术前等效球镜值>-8.00 屈光度,且术后至少随访 1 年。

结果

在 1702 例近视且术前角膜形态正常的患者中,有 35 只眼(2.0%)的综合风险评分为 5~9 分,92 只眼(5.4%)的综合风险评分为 4 分或更高,208 只眼(12.2%)的综合风险评分为 3 分或更高。这些患者均未发生角膜扩张,而术前有角膜地形图提示圆锥角膜但无其他危险因素的 3 只眼发生了角膜扩张。

结论

目前的风险评分系统可以排除 5.4%的 Randleman 评分≥4 分的患者接受 LASIK 手术,还需要告知 6.8%的 Randleman 评分≥3 分的患者存在中度风险,应“谨慎操作”。在术前角膜形态正常的患者中,该评分系统可能无法准确预测患者术后发生 LASIK 角膜扩张的风险。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography.评估 LASIK 术后角膜扩张的风险因素评分系统在正常眼地形中的应用。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;26(4):241-50. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100212-02.
2
Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后角膜扩张的危险因素及预后
Ophthalmology. 2003 Feb;110(2):267-75. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01727-X.
3
Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery.角膜屈光手术后扩张的风险评估。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.073. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
4
Analysis of ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis: risk factors.准分子原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张的分析:危险因素
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1530-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.043.
5
Risk factors for corneal ectasia after LASIK.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张的危险因素。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.045.
6
Association between the percent tissue altered and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography.正常术前形态眼角膜激光原位磨镶术后组织改变百分比与后弹力层扩张的相关性。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):87-95.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
7
Corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis in patients without apparent preoperative risk factors.无明显术前危险因素的患者在准分子原位角膜磨镶术后发生角膜扩张。
Cornea. 2006 May;25(4):388-403. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000222479.68242.77.
8
Bilateral corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis in patient with isolated difference in central corneal thickness between eyes.双眼角膜扩张症患者行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后,双眼中央角膜厚度存在差异。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):1033-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.023.
9
Long-term follow-up of Intacs for post-LASIK corneal ectasia.Intacs用于准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张症的长期随访
Ophthalmology. 2006 Nov;113(11):1909-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.043.
10
Residual bed thickness and corneal forward shift after laser in situ keratomileusis.准分子原位角膜磨镶术后的残余床厚度和角膜前徙
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 May;30(5):1067-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.09.046.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Rate and Causes of Non-candidacy After Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Screening.评估准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)筛查后不符合手术条件的发生率及原因。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 23;17(6):e86618. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86618. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Corneal Ectasia at Multiple Medical Centers in Saudi Arabia: A Hospital-based Study.沙特阿拉伯多个医疗中心角膜扩张症患者的人口统计学和临床特征:一项基于医院的研究。
Oman Med J. 2024 Jul 31;39(4):e649. doi: 10.5001/omj.2024.88. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Comparison of Ectasia versus Pseudoectasia using the Ectasia Risk Factor Score System.
使用扩张风险因素评分系统对扩张与假性扩张进行比较。
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jan 15;59(1):73-83. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.6313. eCollection 2025.
4
Prevalence of Keratoconus and Keratoconus Suspect among Patients Seeking Refractive Surgery in Syria.叙利亚寻求屈光手术患者的圆锥角膜和圆锥角膜疑似患者的患病率。
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 14;29(4):181-185. doi: 10.4103/meajo.meajo_50_23. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec.
5
Clinical Outcomes Comparison of Combined Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Collagen Cross-Linking Versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Only.小切口透镜切除术联合胶原交联与单纯小切口透镜切除术的临床疗效比较
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 11;2022:2625517. doi: 10.1155/2022/2625517. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluating the Ectasia Risk Score System in Cancelled Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Candidates.评估取消准分子原位角膜磨镶术的患者的扩张风险评分系统
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2020 Oct 25;15(4):481-485. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7788. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
7
Evaluation of corneal topography and tomography in fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients for early detection of subclinical keratoconus.评估单侧圆锥角膜患者对侧眼的角膜地形图和断层扫描以早期检测亚临床圆锥角膜。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;68(11):2415-2420. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2129_19.
8
EMKLAS: A New Automatic Scoring System for Early and Mild Keratoconus Detection.EMKLAS:一种用于早期和轻度圆锥角膜检测的新型自动评分系统。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 May 27;9(2):30. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.2.30. eCollection 2020 May.
9
Evaluation of new Corvis ST parameters in normal, Post-LASIK, Post-LASIK keratectasia and keratoconus eyes.评估新 Corvis ST 参数在正常眼、LASIK 术后、LASIK 术后角膜扩张及圆锥角膜眼中的表现。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 30;10(1):5676. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62825-y.
10
Noninvasive Assessment of Corneal Crosslinking With Phase-Decorrelation Optical Coherence Tomography.相移去相关光学相干断层扫描技术在角膜交联中的无创评估。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jan 2;60(1):41-51. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25535.