Institute of Pharmacy and Food Chemistry, University of Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany.
Curr Top Med Chem. 2010;10(3):368-82. doi: 10.2174/156802610790725498.
Fluorimetric assays are convenient and efficient to determine the inhibitory potency of enzyme inhibitors. Since enzyme activity can be blocked in a number of ways, it is important to determine the exact mode of inhibition. The first part of the review deals with kinetic methods to distinguish among the different modes of inhibition. In addition to that, pitfalls are discussed that can be encountered if the mode of inhibition was not thoroughly investigated. The second part of the review deals with some basic techniques of hit validation. Specifically, three error sources that may result in misleadingly strong inhibitors are scrutinized and exemplified for two different typical protease assays (cathepsin B, chymotrypsin). The studied error sources are attenuation of the fluorescence signal, aggregation of the analysed molecules, and irreversible binding of the inhibitor to the enzyme. A simple experimental protocol to detect the aforementioned problems is proposed.
荧光分析测定法是一种方便且高效的方法,可用于确定酶抑制剂的抑制效力。由于可以通过多种方式抑制酶活性,因此确定确切的抑制模式非常重要。本文的第一部分将介绍用于区分不同抑制模式的动力学方法。此外,还将讨论如果未彻底研究抑制模式可能会遇到的陷阱。本文的第二部分将介绍一些用于确证命中化合物的基本技术。具体而言,本文将详细研究并举例说明了可能导致抑制剂产生误导性的三种错误来源,这两种错误来源分别存在于两种不同的典型蛋白酶测定法(组织蛋白酶 B、糜蛋白酶)中。研究的错误来源包括荧光信号的衰减、分析分子的聚集以及抑制剂与酶的不可逆结合。本文提出了一种简单的实验方案,用于检测上述问题。