• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.446:产前诊断中的阵列比较基因组杂交。

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1161-1163. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33cad.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33cad
PMID:20168129
Abstract

The widespread use of array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)for the diagnosis of genomic rearrangements in children with idiopathic mental retardation,developmental delay, and multiple congenital anomalies has spurred interest in applying array CGH technology to prenatal diagnosis. The use of array CGH technology in prenatal diagnosis is currently limited by several factors, including the inability to detect balanced chromosomal rearrangements, the detection of copy number variations of uncertain clinical significance, and significantly higher costs than conventional karyotype analysis. Although array CGH has distinct advantages over classic cytogenetics in certain applications, the technology is not currently a replacement for classic cytogenetics in prenatal diagnosis.

摘要

Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) 的广泛应用,为特发性智力迟钝、发育迟缓及多发先天畸形患儿的基因组重排诊断提供了帮助,这也激发了人们将 array CGH 技术应用于产前诊断的兴趣。array CGH 技术在产前诊断中的应用目前受到多种因素的限制,包括无法检测平衡染色体重排、检测到的拷贝数变异具有不确定的临床意义、以及与传统核型分析相比成本显著增加等。虽然 array CGH 在某些应用中明显优于经典细胞遗传学,但该技术目前并不是产前诊断中经典细胞遗传学的替代方法。

相似文献

1
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.446:产前诊断中的阵列比较基因组杂交。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1161-1163. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33cad.
2
Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 常规核型分析技术之外的阵列比较基因组杂交技术在产前诊断中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):6-14. doi: 10.1002/uog.7754.
3
Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.阵列比较基因组杂交技术在产前诊断中的临床应用:3171 例妊娠的队列研究。
BJOG. 2012 Apr;119(5):614-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03279.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
4
From karyotyping to array-CGH in prenatal diagnosis.从产前诊断中的核型分析到阵列比较基因组杂交技术
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2011;135(3-4):241-50. doi: 10.1159/000334065. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
5
Array-based approaches in prenatal diagnosis.基于芯片技术的产前诊断方法。
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;838:151-71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-507-7_7.
6
Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.靶向微阵列比较基因组杂交技术在产前诊断中的应用。
BMC Med Genet. 2010 Jun 24;11:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-11-102.
7
Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience.产前诊断中的阵列比较基因组杂交:另一项经验。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;25(2):277-84. doi: 10.1159/000224112. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
8
Molecular karyotyping: array CGH quality criteria for constitutional genetic diagnosis.分子核型分析:用于先天性基因诊断的阵列比较基因组杂交质量标准
J Histochem Cytochem. 2005 Mar;53(3):413-22. doi: 10.1369/jhc.4A6436.2005.
9
Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.诊断失败的 array CGH 样本中的胎儿亚微观染色体异常:测序拷贝数作为侵袭性胎儿检测的替代方法用于微阵列。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;45(4):394-401. doi: 10.1002/uog.14767.
10
Detection of chromosomal imbalances in children with idiopathic mental retardation by array based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH).采用基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交技术(array-CGH)检测特发性智力障碍儿童的染色体失衡情况。
J Med Genet. 2005 Sep;42(9):699-705. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.029637.

引用本文的文献

1
Chromosomal Abnormalities Detected by Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Karyotype in Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities.染色体微阵列分析和核型分析检测超声异常胎儿的染色体异常情况。
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Oct 14;17:4645-4658. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S483290. eCollection 2024.
2
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities.超声异常胎儿的染色体微阵列分析
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Aug 15;17:3531-3540. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S472906. eCollection 2024.
3
Is Prenatal Diagnosis Necessary for Fetal Isolated Nasal Bone Absence or Hypoplasia?
胎儿孤立性鼻骨缺失或发育不全是否需要产前诊断?
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Aug 11;14:4435-4441. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S322359. eCollection 2021.
4
A Retrospective Analysis of 10-Year Data Assessed the Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Cytogenomic Abnormalities in Current Prenatal and Pediatric Settings.一项对10年数据的回顾性分析评估了细胞基因组异常在当前产前和儿科环境中的诊断准确性和有效性。
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 20;10:1162. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01162. eCollection 2019.
5
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency.颈部透明带增厚胎儿的染色体微阵列分析与核型分析比较
Med Sci (Basel). 2019 Feb 27;7(3):40. doi: 10.3390/medsci7030040.
6
Detection of copy number variants using chromosomal microarray analysis for the prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects with normal karyotype.使用染色体微阵列分析检测拷贝数变异用于核型正常的先天性心脏病的产前诊断。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jan;33(1):e22630. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22630. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
7
[Advances on prenatal diagnosis of birth defects associated with genetic disorders].[遗传性疾病相关出生缺陷的产前诊断进展]
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 May 25;46(3):227-232. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2017.06.01.
8
Clinical investigation of chromosomal karyotype analysis in cells cultured from fetal bladder puncture liquid.胎儿膀胱穿刺液培养细胞染色体核型分析的临床研究
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Sep;14(3):1879-1883. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4744. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
9
Chromosome microarray analysis in the investigation of children with congenital heart disease.先天性心脏病患儿调查中的染色体微阵列分析
BMC Pediatr. 2017 May 4;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0863-3.
10
Chromosomal Microarrays in Prenatal Diagnosis: Time for a Change of Policy?染色体微阵列技术在产前诊断中的应用:是时候改变政策了吗?
Microarrays (Basel). 2013 Dec 5;2(4):304-17. doi: 10.3390/microarrays2040304.