• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次性喉罩吸引与可重复使用喉罩吸引在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者通气中的应用比较

Disposable versus reusable laryngeal tube suction for ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Amini Afshin, Zand Farid, Maghbooli Masoud

机构信息

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Research Center, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;60(1):32-41. doi: 10.1016/s0034-7094(10)70004-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0034-7094(10)70004-0
PMID:20169261
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The laryngeal tube suction II (LTS-II) is a recent version of reusable supraglottic airway devices allowing gastric drainage. In this prospective, randomized study we compared insertion and ventilation of disposable LTS-II (LTS-D) with reusable type (LTS-II) for airway management under conditions with elevated intra abdominal pressure induced by capnoperitoneum.

METHODS

60 ASA I and II patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to receive either a LTS-D (n=30) or LTS-II (n=30) for airway management. After induction of general anaesthesia the devices were inserted, their correct placement was verified and airway leak pressure was measured. Ease of insertion, quality of airway seal, fiberoptic view, risk of gastric insufflation, insertion of nasogastric tube and postoperative pharyngeal morbidity were examined.

RESULTS

First time and second time success rates were comparable for both groups (86% vs. 93% and 96% vs. 96% in LTS-D and LTS-II groups, respectively). One patient in each group could not be intubated after three attempts. After gas insufflation, ventilation of one patient in LTS-D and 2 patients in LTS-II groups was faulty and the patients were intubated with endotracheal tube. Time until delivery of first tidal volume for LTS-D and LTS-II was 20.8 +/- 11.6 s, and 18.2 +/- 4.8 seconds respectively (p = 0.27), fixation and manipulation time was 73.3 +/- 18.5 and 65.5 +/- 16.2 seconds, respectively (p = 0.096). Nasogastric tube insertion was successful in all patients. There were no significant differences in postoperative complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

Both devices provide a secure airway under conditions of elevated intra abdominal pressure.

摘要

背景与目的

喉罩抽吸二代(LTS-II)是一种新型可重复使用的声门上气道装置,可实现胃引流。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们比较了一次性喉罩抽吸二代(LTS-D)和可重复使用型(LTS-II)在二氧化碳气腹导致腹内压升高情况下用于气道管理时的插入和通气情况。

方法

60例接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I级和II级患者被随机分为两组,分别使用LTS-D(n = 30)或LTS-II(n = 30)进行气道管理。全身麻醉诱导后插入装置,确认其正确位置并测量气道漏气压力。检查插入的难易程度、气道密封质量、纤维喉镜视野、胃充气风险、鼻胃管插入情况及术后咽部并发症。

结果

两组的首次和二次成功率相当(LTS-D组分别为86%和96%,LTS-II组分别为93%和96%)。每组各有1例患者在三次尝试后仍无法插管。充气后,LTS-D组有1例患者和LTS-II组有2例患者通气出现故障,随后均行气管内插管。LTS-D和LTS-II输送首个潮气量的时间分别为20.8±11.6秒和18.2±4.8秒(p = 0.27),固定和操作时间分别为73.3±18.5秒和65.5±16.2秒(p = 0.096)。所有患者鼻胃管插入均成功。术后主诉无显著差异。

结论

在腹内压升高的情况下,两种装置均能提供安全的气道。

相似文献

1
Disposable versus reusable laryngeal tube suction for ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.一次性喉罩吸引与可重复使用喉罩吸引在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者通气中的应用比较
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;60(1):32-41. doi: 10.1016/s0034-7094(10)70004-0.
2
The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube Suction for ventilation in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.喉罩气道双管型和喉管吸引装置在妇科腹腔镜手术通气中的应用。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Feb;22(2):117-22. doi: 10.1017/s0265021505000220.
3
A comparison of the laryngeal tube-S and Proseal laryngeal mask during outpatient surgical procedures.门诊手术中喉罩-S与食管引流型喉罩的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;24(10):847-51. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507000804. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
4
Laryngeal tube S II, laryngeal tube S disposable, Fastrach laryngeal mask and Fastrach laryngeal mask disposable during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison between reusable and disposable supraglottic airway devices.在择期手术中使用 Laryngeal tube S II、一次性 Laryngeal tube S、Fastrach 喉罩和一次性 Fastrach 喉罩:可重复使用和一次性声门上气道装置的随机对照比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 May;27(5):468-72. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283372512.
5
Basic life support trained nurses ventilate more efficiently with laryngeal mask supreme than with facemask or laryngeal tube suction-disposable--a prospective, randomized clinical trial.接受过基础生命支持培训的护士使用喉罩通气道进行通气比使用面罩或一次性喉管吸引通气更有效——一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Resuscitation. 2014 Apr;85(4):499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
6
A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure.一项比较一次性喉管吸引器与喉罩的随机前瞻性对照试验:头颈部位置对口咽密封压力的影响。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0237-7.
7
Laryngeal tube suction II or endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a head down position: A randomised controlled trial.喉管吸引 II 或气管插管在头低位行腹腔镜前列腺根治术:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jul;34(7):441-447. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000547.
8
A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Suction in mechanically ventilated patients.一项在机械通气患者中比较ProSeal喉罩气道与带吸引装置喉管的随机对照试验。
Anesthesiology. 2004 Aug;101(2):316-20. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00011.
9
[Intubating laryngeal tube suction disposable: Initial clinical experiences with a novel device for endotracheal intubation].一次性气管插管喉罩吸引器:一种新型气管插管装置的初步临床经验
Anaesthesist. 2016 Jan;65(1):30-35. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0100-0. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Disposable laryngeal tube suction--a randomized comparison of two insertion techniques performed by novice users in anaesthetised patients.一次性喉管吸引——新手在麻醉患者中执行的两种插入技术的随机比较。
Resuscitation. 2008 Mar;76(3):364-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.08.018. Epub 2007 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomised controlled trial comparing ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, i-gel and Laryngeal Tube Suction-D under general anaesthesia for elective surgical patients requiring controlled ventilation.一项针对需要控制通气的择期手术患者,在全身麻醉下比较ProSeal喉罩气道、i-gel和Laryngeal Tube Suction-D的随机对照试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Dec;61(12):972-977. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_339_17.
2
Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management.喉罩在紧急气道管理中的置入成功率。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3619159. doi: 10.1155/2016/3619159. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
[Second generation laryngeal masks : expanded indications].
[第二代喉罩:适应证扩展]
Anaesthesist. 2015 Jan;64(1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2410-z.