• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甘油三庚酸酯(GTH)在加工动物副产品中测定的分析方法验证:协作研究结果。

Validation of an analytical method for the determination of glyceroltriheptanoate (GTH) in processed animal by-products: results of a collaborative study.

机构信息

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, B-2440 Geel, Belgium.

出版信息

Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2010 Jun;27(6):793-800. doi: 10.1080/19440040903551939.

DOI:10.1080/19440040903551939
PMID:20169484
Abstract

The performance characteristics of a method for the determination of the marker substance glycerol triheptanoate (GTH) in processed animal by-products (ABPs) based on gas chromatography (GC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) were determined via a collaborative study. Within the European Union, GTH needs to be added to the portion of processed ABPs that must not enter the feed and food chain (Categories 1 and 2) at a minimum concentration of 250 mg kg(-1) related to the fat fraction of the test samples analysed. The test materials included in the validation study consisted of three meat and bone meal (MBM) and three fat samples that contained GTH at different concentrations ranging from 61 to 455 mg kg(-1). The relative standard deviation of repeatability (RSD(r)) varied from 3.4 to 7.8% and the relative standard deviation of reproducibility (RSD(R)) varied from 9.0 to 16.5%, corresponding to HORRAT values that were, in all cases, equal or below the critical value of 2.0. The estimated trueness expressed in terms of average concentration compared to the target concentrations of GTH in all test materials varied from 95 to 107%, confirming acceptable values for the trueness of the method. Based on the acceptable values for precision and trueness, the method is fit for the intended purpose and can be used for official control purposes to determine GTH in processed animal by-products from Category 1 and Category 2.

摘要

采用协作研究的方法,对基于气相色谱(GC)-质谱联用(MS)测定加工动物副产品(ABPs)中甘油三庚酸酯(GTH)标志物的方法的性能特征进行了确定。在欧盟,GTH 必须添加到不得进入饲料和食物链的加工 ABPs 部分(类别 1 和 2)中,其最低浓度与分析测试样品脂肪部分相关,为 250mg/kg。验证研究中包含的测试材料包括三种肉骨粉(MBM)和三种脂肪样品,其中含有不同浓度的 GTH,范围为 61 至 455mg/kg。重复性(RSD(r))的相对标准偏差为 3.4%至 7.8%,再现性(RSD(R))的相对标准偏差为 9.0%至 16.5%,相应的 HORRAT 值在所有情况下均等于或低于 2.0 的临界值。以所有测试材料中 GTH 的目标浓度表示的平均浓度计算的估计准确性从 95%到 107%不等,证实了该方法准确性的可接受值。基于可接受的精密度和准确性值,该方法适用于预期目的,可以用于官方控制目的,以确定来自类别 1 和类别 2 的加工动物副产品中的 GTH。

相似文献

1
Validation of an analytical method for the determination of glyceroltriheptanoate (GTH) in processed animal by-products: results of a collaborative study.甘油三庚酸酯(GTH)在加工动物副产品中测定的分析方法验证:协作研究结果。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2010 Jun;27(6):793-800. doi: 10.1080/19440040903551939.
2
Use of glyceroltriheptanoate as marker for processed animal by-products: development and validation of an analytical method.使用甘油三庚酸酯作为加工动物副产品的标志物:分析方法的开发和验证。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2009 Apr;26(4):466-74. doi: 10.1080/02652030802579148.
3
Validation of an analytical method for the determination of carbadox and olaquindox in feedstuff by liquid chromatography coupled to UV and/or diode array detection.液相色谱-紫外和/或二极管阵列检测法测定饲料中卡巴氧和喹乙醇分析方法的验证
Food Addit Contam. 2007 Nov;24(11):1226-35. doi: 10.1080/02652030701405544.
4
Glyceroltriheptanoate (GTH) occurrence in animal by-products: a monitoring study to minimise safety-related risk of misuse.甘油三庚酸酯(GTH)在动物副产品中的存在情况:一项旨在将误用导致的安全相关风险降至最低的监测研究。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2022 Jun;39(6):1047-1052. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2022.2059109. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Determination of ionophore coccidiostats in feedingstuffs by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Part I. Application to targeted feed.液相色谱-串联质谱法测定饲料中的离子载体抗球虫药 第一部分. 应用于目标饲料
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008 Aug 5;47(4-5):750-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 Mar 15.
6
Inter-laboratory comparison of an analytical method for the determination of the feed additive semduramicin in poultry feed at authorised level by liquid chromatography single quadrupole mass spectrometry.用液相色谱单四级杆质谱法测定家禽饲料中许可添加水平的饲用萨梅霉素的分析方法的实验室间比较。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2011 Jan;28(1):35-43. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2010.538727.
7
Evaluation and validation of two chromatographic methods (HPLC-fluorescence and LC-MS/MS) for the determination and confirmation of ochratoxin A in pig tissues.评估和验证两种色谱方法(HPLC-荧光法和 LC-MS/MS 法)用于猪组织中赭曲霉毒素 A 的测定和确证。
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010 May;58(4):1074-81. doi: 10.1007/s00244-009-9436-2. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
8
Simultaneous determination of 24 sulfonamide residues in meat by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.超高效液相色谱串联质谱法同时测定肉类中24种磺胺类药物残留
J Chromatogr A. 2008 Jul 25;1200(2):144-55. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.095. Epub 2008 Jun 8.
9
Development of a multi-residue method for the determination of pesticides in cereals and dry animal feed using gas chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry II. Improvement and extension to new analytes.使用气相色谱 - 串联四极杆质谱法测定谷物和干动物饲料中农药的多残留方法的开发II. 对新分析物的改进与扩展
J Chromatogr A. 2008 Oct 24;1208(1-2):202-14. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.08.068. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
10
Determination of the performance characteristics of a new multi-residue method for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids and anabolic steroids in food animal tissues.食品动物组织中用于检测非甾体抗炎药、皮质类固醇和合成代谢类固醇的新型多残留方法的性能特征测定。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2008 Dec;25(12):1482-96. doi: 10.1080/02652030802273122.

引用本文的文献

1
Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP).加工动物蛋白(PAP)引发的疯牛病风险的最新定量风险评估(QRA)。
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 17;16(7):e05314. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5314. eCollection 2018 Jul.