Suppr超能文献

因子 VIII 抑制剂检测的改进:从贝塞斯达到奈梅亨。

Improvements in factor VIII inhibitor detection: From Bethesda to Nijmegen.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Semin Thromb Hemost. 2009 Nov;35(8):752-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245107. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

Abstract

All methods for the detection of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors are based on the measurement of inactivation of FVIII in a mixture of the test plasma containing the putative inhibitor and an exogenous source of FVIII. Various types of assays have been developed since the first inhibitor was described in 1941. Nowadays, two methods are preferably used, the Bethesda assay and the Nijmegen assay. Although the Nijmegen assay shows a better specificity and intra- and interlaboratory variation, it is still hampered by several limitations related to assay characteristics (pH, temperature, and time of incubation), type of control sample, and the von Willebrand factor content of the assay mixture. Epitope specificity plays an important role in the reliability of functional assays because inhibitors against the C2 domain are more difficult to quantify compared with inhibitors against the A2 domain. Finally, lupus anticoagulants can interfere with inhibitor assays, resulting in aberrant results. This report describes in detail the various problems encountered with the assays used in the quantification of functional FVIII inhibitors.

摘要

所有检测因子 VIII(FVIII)抑制剂的方法都是基于测量测试血浆中潜在抑制剂与外源性 FVIII 混合物中 FVIII 的失活。自 1941 年首次描述抑制剂以来,已经开发了各种类型的检测方法。如今,两种方法被广泛使用,即贝塞斯达检测法和尼梅根检测法。尽管尼梅根检测法显示出更好的特异性和实验室内部及实验室之间的变异性,但它仍然受到与检测特性(pH 值、温度和孵育时间)、对照样本类型以及检测混合物中血管性血友病因子含量相关的几个限制。表位特异性在功能检测的可靠性中起着重要作用,因为与针对 A2 结构域的抑制剂相比,针对 C2 结构域的抑制剂更难定量。最后,狼疮抗凝剂会干扰抑制剂检测,导致结果异常。本报告详细描述了在定量功能性 FVIII 抑制剂时使用的检测方法中遇到的各种问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验