• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最优控制理论在非药物干预中的应用

An optimal control theory approach to non-pharmaceutical interventions.

机构信息

School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S Martin Jischke Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2032, USA.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 19;10:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-32.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2334-10-32
PMID:20170501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2850906/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) are the first line of defense against pandemic influenza. These interventions dampen virus spread by reducing contact between infected and susceptible persons. Because they curtail essential societal activities, they must be applied judiciously. Optimal control theory is an approach for modeling and balancing competing objectives such as epidemic spread and NPI cost.

METHODS

We apply optimal control on an epidemiologic compartmental model to develop triggers for NPI implementation. The objective is to minimize expected person-days lost from influenza related deaths and NPI implementations for the model. We perform a multivariate sensitivity analysis based on Latin Hypercube Sampling to study the effects of input parameters on the optimal control policy. Additional studies investigated the effects of departures from the modeling assumptions, including exponential terminal time and linear NPI implementation cost.

RESULTS

An optimal policy is derived for the control model using a linear NPI implementation cost. Linear cost leads to a "bang-bang" policy in which NPIs are applied at maximum strength when certain state criteria are met. Multivariate sensitivity analyses are presented which indicate that NPI cost, death rate, and recovery rate are influential in determining the policy structure. Further death rate, basic reproductive number and recovery rate are the most influential in determining the expected cumulative death. When applying the NPI policy, the cumulative deaths under exponential and gamma terminal times are close, which implies that the outcome of applying the "bang-bang" policy is insensitive to the exponential assumption. Quadratic cost leads to a multi-level policy in which NPIs are applied at varying strength levels, again based on certain state criteria. Results indicate that linear cost leads to more costly implementation resulting in fewer deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of optimal control theory can provide valuable insight to developing effective control strategies for pandemic. Our findings highlight the importance of establishing a sensitive and timely surveillance system for pandemic preparedness.

摘要

背景

非药物干预(NPI)是应对大流行性流感的第一道防线。这些干预措施通过减少感染者与易感者之间的接触来抑制病毒传播。由于它们限制了基本的社会活动,因此必须明智地应用。最优控制理论是一种用于建模和平衡竞争目标的方法,例如传染病的传播和 NPI 的成本。

方法

我们将最优控制应用于流行病学隔室模型,以制定 NPI 实施的触发条件。目标是使与流感相关的死亡和 NPI 实施所导致的预期人员损失最小化。我们基于拉丁超立方抽样进行了多变量敏感性分析,以研究输入参数对最优控制策略的影响。其他研究还考察了偏离模型假设的影响,包括指数终端时间和线性 NPI 实施成本。

结果

针对使用线性 NPI 实施成本的控制模型,得出了最优策略。线性成本导致“bang-bang”策略,即当满足某些状态标准时,以最大强度应用 NPI。提出了多变量敏感性分析,表明 NPI 成本、死亡率和恢复率对确定策略结构具有重要影响。进一步的死亡率、基本繁殖数和恢复率是决定预期累积死亡的最主要因素。在应用 NPI 策略时,指数和伽马终端时间下的累积死亡人数接近,这意味着应用“bang-bang”策略的结果对指数假设不敏感。二次成本导致多水平策略,即根据某些状态标准,以不同的强度水平应用 NPI。结果表明,线性成本导致更昂贵的实施,从而导致更少的死亡。

结论

最优控制理论的应用可以为制定大流行控制策略提供有价值的见解。我们的研究结果强调了建立敏感和及时的大流行监测系统对于大流行准备的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/6f5cdd78e534/1471-2334-10-32-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/51a7180dab71/1471-2334-10-32-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/8ee89f077e45/1471-2334-10-32-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/7135223369a4/1471-2334-10-32-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/d30c99817474/1471-2334-10-32-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/6f5cdd78e534/1471-2334-10-32-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/51a7180dab71/1471-2334-10-32-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/8ee89f077e45/1471-2334-10-32-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/7135223369a4/1471-2334-10-32-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/d30c99817474/1471-2334-10-32-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ee/2850906/6f5cdd78e534/1471-2334-10-32-5.jpg

相似文献

1
An optimal control theory approach to non-pharmaceutical interventions.最优控制理论在非药物干预中的应用
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 19;10:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-32.
2
Design of non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies for pandemic influenza outbreaks.大流行性流感暴发的非药物干预策略设计
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 29;14:1328. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1328.
3
Theodore E. Woodward award: non-pharmaceutical interventions employed by major American cities during the 1918-19 influenza pandemic.西奥多·E·伍德沃德奖:美国主要城市在1918 - 19年流感大流行期间采用的非药物干预措施
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2008;119:129-38; discussion 138-42.
4
Disease Interventions Can Interfere with One Another through Disease-Behaviour Interactions.疾病干预措施可能通过疾病与行为的相互作用而相互干扰。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Jun 5;11(6):e1004291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004291. eCollection 2015 Jun.
5
A small community model for the transmission of infectious diseases: comparison of school closure as an intervention in individual-based models of an influenza pandemic.一种传染病传播的小型社区模型:将学校关闭作为流感大流行个体模型干预措施的比较。
PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004005. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
6
Pandemic unpreparedness?对大流行病毫无防备?
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Jan;5(1):2. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1591.
7
Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic.美国各城市在1918 - 1919年流感大流行期间实施的非药物干预措施。
JAMA. 2007 Aug 8;298(6):644-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.6.644.
8
Deep reinforcement learning framework for controlling infectious disease outbreaks in the context of multi-jurisdictions.多辖区传染病爆发控制的深度强化学习框架。
Math Biosci Eng. 2023 Jun 29;20(8):14306-14326. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023640.
9
COVID-19 pandemic spread against countries' non-pharmaceutical interventions responses: a data-mining driven comparative study.新冠疫情大流行对各国非药物干预措施的影响:基于数据挖掘的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 1;21(1):1607. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11251-4.
10
Influenza a (H1N1) outbreak and challenges for pharmacotherapy.甲型H1N1流感疫情及药物治疗面临的挑战。
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009 Apr-Jun;53(2):113-26.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic, individual, and familial risk correlates of brain network controllability in major depressive disorder.遗传、个体和家族风险与重度抑郁症中脑网络可控性的相关性。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;28(3):1057-1063. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01936-6. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
2
An application of optimal control in medical systems: optimal investment strategy in doctors.最优控制在医疗系统中的应用:医生的最优投资策略
Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform. 2023;12(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s13721-022-00408-9. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
Combining and comparing regional SARS-CoV-2 epidemic dynamics in Italy: Bayesian meta-analysis of compartmental models and global sensitivity analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling an outbreak of an emerging pathogen.模拟一种新出现病原体的爆发。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Sep;5(9):700-9. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1660.
2
The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in U.S. cities.公共卫生措施对美国城市1918年流感大流行的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7588-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611071104. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
3
Nonpharmaceutical influenza mitigation strategies, US communities, 1918-1920 pandemic.1918 - 1920年大流行期间美国社区的非药物性流感缓解策略
结合和比较意大利地区 SARS-CoV-2 疫情动态:房室模型的贝叶斯荟萃分析和全局敏感性分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;10:919456. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.919456. eCollection 2022.
4
Characterisation of Omicron Variant during COVID-19 Pandemic and the Impact of Vaccination, Transmission Rate, Mortality, and Reinfection in South Africa, Germany, and Brazil.新冠疫情期间奥密克戎变异株的特征以及在南非、德国和巴西的疫苗接种、传播率、死亡率和再感染情况的影响
BioTech (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;11(2):12. doi: 10.3390/biotech11020012.
5
Analytical estimation of maximum fraction of infected individuals with one-shot non-pharmaceutical intervention in a hybrid epidemic model.在混合传染病模型中,单次非药物干预下受感染个体的最大比例的分析估计。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07403-5.
6
Lessons from past pandemics: a systematic review of evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress COVID-19.从过去的大流行病中吸取的教训:系统评价有证据支持、具有成本效益的干预措施以抑制 COVID-19。
Syst Rev. 2022 May 12;11(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01958-9.
7
Timing the race of vaccination, new variants, and relaxing restrictions during COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,疫苗接种、新变种以及放松限制的赛跑时机
J Comput Sci. 2022 May;61:101660. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101660. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Impact of vaccine supplies and delays on optimal control of the COVID-19 pandemic: mapping interventions for the Philippines.疫苗供应和延迟对 COVID-19 大流行最佳控制的影响:为菲律宾规划干预措施。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Aug 9;10(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00886-5.
9
Control with uncertain data of socially structured compartmental epidemic models.具有不确定数据的社会结构隔室传染病模型的控制。
J Math Biol. 2021 May 23;82(7):63. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01617-y.
10
Prediction of Covid-19 spreading and optimal coordination of counter-measures: From microscopic to macroscopic models to Pareto fronts.预测新冠病毒的传播和优化应对措施的协调:从微观模型到宏观模型到帕累托前沿。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0249676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249676. eCollection 2021.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Dec;12(12):1961-4. doi: 10.3201/eid1212.060506.
4
Targeted social distancing design for pandemic influenza.大流行性流感的针对性社交距离设计
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Nov;12(11):1671-81. doi: 10.3201/eid1211.060255.
5
Comparative estimation of the reproduction number for pandemic influenza from daily case notification data.基于每日病例通报数据对大流行性流感繁殖数的比较估计。
J R Soc Interface. 2007 Feb 22;4(12):155-66. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0161.
6
What is the best control strategy for multiple infectious disease outbreaks?针对多种传染病爆发的最佳控制策略是什么?
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 22;274(1611):833-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0015.
7
A 'small-world-like' model for comparing interventions aimed at preventing and controlling influenza pandemics.一种用于比较旨在预防和控制流感大流行的干预措施的“类小世界”模型。
BMC Med. 2006 Oct 23;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-26.
8
Uncertainty in predictions of disease spread and public health responses to bioterrorism and emerging diseases.疾病传播预测以及针对生物恐怖主义和新出现疾病的公共卫生应对措施中的不确定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15693-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600816103. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
9
Smallpox transmission and control: spatial dynamics in Great Britain.天花的传播与控制:英国的空间动态
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 15;103(33):12637-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510873103. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
10
Poxy models and rash decisions.痘疹模型与仓促决定。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 15;103(33):12221-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605502103. Epub 2006 Aug 7.