• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在混合传染病模型中,单次非药物干预下受感染个体的最大比例的分析估计。

Analytical estimation of maximum fraction of infected individuals with one-shot non-pharmaceutical intervention in a hybrid epidemic model.

机构信息

Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3-09 Aoba, Aramaki-aza Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8579, Miyagi, Japan.

PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, 332-0012, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07403-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-022-07403-5
PMID:35650534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9157046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Facing a global epidemic of new infectious diseases such as COVID-19, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), which reduce transmission rates without medical actions, are being implemented around the world to mitigate spreads. One of the problems in assessing the effects of NPIs is that different NPIs have been implemented at different times based on the situation of each country; therefore, few assumptions can be shared about how the introduction of policies affects the patient population. Mathematical models can contribute to further understanding these phenomena by obtaining analytical solutions as well as numerical simulations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, an NPI was introduced into the SIR model for a conceptual study of infectious diseases under the condition that the transmission rate was reduced to a fixed value only once within a finite time duration, and its effect was analyzed numerically and theoretically. It was analytically shown that the maximum fraction of infected individuals and the final size could be larger if the intervention starts too early. The analytical results also suggested that more individuals may be infected at the peak of the second wave with a stronger intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides quantitative relationship between the strength of a one-shot intervention and the reduction in the number of patients with no approximation. This suggests the importance of the strength and time of NPIs, although detailed studies are necessary for the implementation of NPIs in complicated real-world environments as the model used in this study is based on various simplifications.

摘要

背景

面对 COVID-19 等新传染病的全球流行,全球各地正在实施非药物干预(NPIs)措施,这些措施无需采取医疗措施即可降低传播率,以减轻传播。评估 NPIs 效果的一个问题是,不同的 NPIs 根据每个国家的情况在不同的时间实施;因此,关于政策的引入如何影响患者群体,几乎没有可以共享的假设。数学模型可以通过获得解析解和数值模拟来帮助进一步理解这些现象。

方法和结果

在这项研究中,在 SIR 模型中引入了一种 NPI,以便在仅在有限时间内将传播率降低到固定值一次的情况下对传染病进行概念性研究,并对其进行了数值和理论分析。分析表明,如果干预开始得太早,感染人数的最大比例和最终规模可能会更大。分析结果还表明,随着干预力度的增强,第二次波峰时可能会有更多的人感染。

结论

本研究提供了单次干预的强度与无近似情况下患者数量减少之间的定量关系。这表明 NPIs 的强度和时间很重要,尽管需要对在复杂的现实环境中实施 NPIs 进行详细研究,因为本研究中使用的模型基于各种简化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/6556446eba72/12879_2022_7403_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/d98fbd283fa7/12879_2022_7403_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/30b96cb80a80/12879_2022_7403_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/6a91ba597907/12879_2022_7403_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/6556446eba72/12879_2022_7403_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/d98fbd283fa7/12879_2022_7403_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/30b96cb80a80/12879_2022_7403_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/6a91ba597907/12879_2022_7403_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/9158172/6556446eba72/12879_2022_7403_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analytical estimation of maximum fraction of infected individuals with one-shot non-pharmaceutical intervention in a hybrid epidemic model.在混合传染病模型中,单次非药物干预下受感染个体的最大比例的分析估计。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07403-5.
2
Effects of Mitigation and Control Policies in Realistic Epidemic Models Accounting for Household Transmission Dynamics.考虑家庭传播动态的现实疫情模型中缓解和控制政策的效果。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):5-17. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231205565. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
The non-pharmaceutical interventions may affect the advantage in transmission of mutated variants during epidemics: A conceptual model for COVID-19.非药物干预措施可能会影响传染病期间突变变体的传播优势:COVID-19 的概念模型。
J Theor Biol. 2022 Jun 7;542:111105. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111105. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
4
Spatially-implicit modelling of disease-behaviour interactions in the context of non-pharmaceutical interventions.非药物干预背景下疾病行为相互作用的空间隐式建模
Math Biosci Eng. 2018 Apr 1;15(2):461-483. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018021.
5
Effect of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 in Rwanda: An Observational Study.卢旺达非药物干预对 COVID-19 的影响:一项观察性研究。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Jun;13(2):239-247. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00094-4. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
6
The impacts of simultaneous disease intervention decisions on epidemic outcomes.同时进行的疾病干预决策对疫情结果的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2016 Apr 21;395:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Model analysis and data validation of structured prevention and control interruptions of emerging infectious diseases.对新发传染病结构化预防和控制中断进行模型分析和数据验证。
J Math Biol. 2024 Apr 14;88(6):62. doi: 10.1007/s00285-024-02083-y.
8
Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19 reduced the incidence of infectious diseases: a controlled interrupted time-series study.非药物干预措施降低了 COVID-19 传染病发病率:一项基于对照的中断时间序列研究。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2023 Mar 9;12(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01066-3.
9
Assessing the impact of adherence to Non-pharmaceutical interventions and indirect transmission on the dynamics of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study.评估遵守非药物干预措施和间接传播对新冠病毒动态的影响:一项数学建模研究。
Math Biosci Eng. 2021 Oct 15;18(6):8905-8932. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021439.
10
The Effects of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Mortality: A Generalized Synthetic Control Approach Across 169 Countries.非药物干预措施对新冠病毒疾病死亡率的影响:一项涵盖169个国家的广义合成对照法研究
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 4;10:820642. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.820642. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning insights on the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 in Nigeria.机器学习对尼日利亚非药物干预措施抗击新冠肺炎有效性的见解。
Int Health. 2025 Sep 3;17(5):809-819. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae065.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal control of an SIR epidemic through finite-time non-pharmaceutical intervention.通过有限时间的非药物干预对 SIR 传染病的最优控制。
J Math Biol. 2021 Jun 26;83(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01628-9.
2
Universal features of epidemic models under social distancing guidelines.社交距离指导方针下流行模型的普遍特征。
Annu Rev Control. 2021;51:426-440. doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
3
Optimal timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control.最佳时机的一次性干预措施对控制疫情。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 18;17(3):e1008763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008763. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
The COVID-19 outbreak in Sichuan, China: Epidemiology and impact of interventions.中国四川新冠肺炎疫情:流行病学与干预影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Dec 28;16(12):e1008467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008467. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
New applications related to Covid-19.与新冠病毒相关的新应用。
Results Phys. 2021 Jan;20:103663. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103663. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
6
Non-compulsory measures sufficiently reduced human mobility in Tokyo during the COVID-19 epidemic.非强制性措施在 COVID-19 疫情期间极大地降低了东京的人员流动性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 22;10(1):18053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75033-5.
7
Association between mobility patterns and COVID-19 transmission in the USA: a mathematical modelling study.美国移动模式与 COVID-19 传播的关联:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1247-1254. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30553-3. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
8
Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period.预测 SARS-CoV-2 的传播动力学,直至大流行后期。
Science. 2020 May 22;368(6493):860-868. doi: 10.1126/science.abb5793. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
9
The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China.人口流动和防控措施对中国 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):493-497. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4218. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
10
Countries test tactics in 'war' against COVID-19.各国在抗击新冠疫情的“战争”中试验策略。
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1287-1288. doi: 10.1126/science.367.6484.1287.